Covert operations entangle the U.S. in many problems


Hello and welcome to American Dissident Voices, I'm Shaun Walker.

I recall during the Clinton administration that the term 'Covert Operations' was used quite heavily by members of the Clinton Cabinet in a positive manner. In the mid 1990s, the Jews who control the US media didn't regard this term, Covert Operations, as a political liability. If the head of the CIA stated that he was going to take a more aggressive approach to Covert Operations, the media would just report that statement, without a second thought. It was Politically Correct to say that America should pursue Covert Operations against countries that the US State Department labeled as "Rouge Nations." For an overt example, if the US Navy shot down a Libyan fighter-jet, the media would report how the US Navy, 35 war ships, with 28,000 men were just peacefully conducting war games off the Libyan coast and two Libyan fighter-jets took an offensive stance, came too close to the US naval armada and had to be shot down. The manner in which the US media reported these events made one think that "those damn Libyans" were anti-American troublemakers. Yet, when you stop to think about it, if Libya had half as many war ships, 100 miles off the coast of Florida, and were conducting military exercises, the US Navy would probably sink every Libyan ship there. There is no set standard of right from wrong, but rather a media bias on most world events.

After 9-11, the world changed. That was a huge event that will still cause repercussions for many more years to come. After 9-11, the media put on their thinking caps and came to the conclusion that the term 'Covert Operations' was really just a very biased way of saying "US sponsored Terrorism." I mean, after all, when the US inserts a team of well-trained FAST teams into a hostile country with the intent of killing someone in that country, then in what way can that not be described as "terrorism"?

During World War II, the US military developed the concept of a highly trained, well-funded group, within the US Army, to export terrorism. They didn't use that term, but that is what they were -- and still are -- trained to do. This group of people is called the "Special Forces." They were given a green beret, so they are often just called the Green Berets. This group was founded on the principles of unconventional warfare. During World War Two, there was a popular and widespread use of the Commandos. Every country had some form of Commandos or wanted to create them. In fact, each service in the US military created their own commandos. The US Navy created the UDT teams, which later became the Navy SEALS. The US Marines created the Raiders, lead by Colonel Carlson along with Marine Sniper teams, which were very effective in mainland China and the Island hopping campaigns.

But, they were all used within a huge conventional war. The Marine Snipers and the Raiders were disbanded after the war, and only brought back during the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War had many aspects of conventional and unconventional warfare. The Special Forces teams proved themselves as masters of unconventional warfare, but even this had political liabilities. For example, sending US troops into Cambodia openly caused a huge world-wide condemnation of America. But, the US had been sending US Special Forces teams into Cambodia for at least two years prior to that, without any real media problems. This caused the military and political leaders to rethink their war plans. A newly created unit, the Study and Observations Group, SOG, was in a very convoluted way, cut loose from direct US military funding, and came under the funding of the CIA. This was still a US Government Agency, but because of all the Cold War spying from the Soviet Union, the entire budget of the CIA was classified as Top Secret. Even elected US Congressman couldn't gain access under normal conditions to the financial books of the CIA. This allowed the US to wage an aggressive war -- privately. The CIA, with a huge, multi-billion dollar budget, could, and did, raise a private army. During the Vietnam War, the SOG in Laos had a private mercenary army of over 20,000 soldiers. This was a clear example of the people in power circumventing US accountability laws and waging a private, yet well known war. There were US Special Forces troops who were actively engaged with this private army in Laos and the US government even charted a small air force from Flying Tigers to maintain air resupply over Laos. It was an unbelievably huge and well financed war that did not officially exist on the public accounting books within the US government. The hypocrisy of all this is just too huge for words, and it created a new tool with which the power structure fell in love.

The US had started interfering with other nations affairs in the mid-1800s. The Spanish-American War ushered the US openly into the era of the Colonial Powers. The US Marines were used extensively in Central America and the Philippines from 1900 up to the start of World War Two. So, for the US to start aggressive wars in Laos and Cambodia was really nothing new. In the 1930s, the Commandant of the Marine Corps resigned, disgusted with US foreign policy. This Marine, only one of two Marines to ever be twice awarded the Medal of Honor, was Major General Smedley Butler. He said, "Where the mafia hires hit men to do their duty work, Wall Street uses the US Marines to do their dirty work. War is a racket."

These Marines in the 1920s were openly reported in the US media, even glorified. "Chesty" Puller became famous for chasing Nicaraguan guerillas through the hills and countryside.

But, after World War Two, during the Cold War, everything became more secret. The Soviets used secret agents in large numbers, as did the British and the US. A quiet, officially denied war was waged all over the world. This caused many excesses. In 1947, when Guatemala attempted to nationalize the land owned by US fruit companies, the CIA created a bogus communist plot and overthrew the Guatemalan government, which had the side effect of causing a 40 year civil war, with huge loss of life.

If Iran were to destabilize a country such as Guatemala, the US would use this as a pretext to invade Iran. When the US does it, this is lied about from the US State Department, which denies responsibility and then justifies the action as being "necessary to secure US vital interests."

That term "vital US interests" must kill thousands of people every year. I know the US President Johnson saw Laos and Cambodia as vital US interests, because of the "Domino Theory." If Laos went Communist, why then, maybe Burma might next. Actually, who cares what type of government those countries have? They should not even be a focus of US foreign policy, but our government has such an enormous infection of Jewish influence, that there is virtually no place on the planet safe from "vital US interests."

In early 1991, when the first Iraq war was ending, President George Bush senior, sent the US into Somalia. I can still remember watching the acting Secretary of State, Lawrence Eagleburger, explaining why we sent in the US military to Somalia. Mr. Eagleburger said there were 1,000 people starving every day in Somalia and the US was guilty of passive genocide unless we sent our troops in. Fact is there were no real starvation at all. There was actually large number of illegal aliens migrating into Somalia from Ethiopia because the food was more plentiful.

But, there you have it, another top level official blatantly lying to the US public. We waste a few billion dollars, many good people die, nothing is accomplished, and we leave. No one is ever held accountable, no trial or execution of those involved in this high crime. If you or I were to yell fire in a crowded movie theater and one person died, we would be held legally responsible for that death and punished under existing laws. If you are the President, say you are George W. Bush, and you make up a monumental series of lies, get thousands of US employees to fabricate official files to produce bogus evidence to start a war, with over one thousand seven hundred American killed, then you should also be liable under existing US laws for such a crime. But, I doubt we'll see the Texas idiot on trial anytime soon.

Now, instead of pulling out of the region that we have ruined, we are now waging a campaign of covert operations. There is the occasional bomb inside Iran, set off by a dissident. But, everyone knows who is behind these anti-government agents in Iran. And, besides the use of Special Forces troops, and Delta Force or SEAL teams, the US has an army of CIA agents that are employed full-time with the task of screwing up a country's internal stability. And, worst of all, everyone knows this.

Virtually every major newspaper in the world has written articles about the US involvement in the Ukrainian elections and re-elections and the struggle between the two main competitors in that country. This is now called the Orange Revolution. This was basically a CIA covert operation which didn't use any military assets, such as Special Forces teams. This certainly was an act of Political Terrorism. The recent turmoil in the other regions of the former Soviet Union are also backed by the US CIA under the ever omnipotent guise of "vital US interests." That reminds me of a saying. This saying is somewhat rhetorical in nature, but it is so true.

Here it is. "What is worse then living under all the enormous and ever encroaching US laws?" The answer is: "To live in a foreign country and have US foreign policy save you."

How many countries does the CIA operate in? Probably in all of them. If a country such as Bulgaria, which has a somewhat pro-White, anti-Jew party, called "Attack," were to come to power, the Jew-World-Order would create a crisis. Maybe it would be drugs, such as when we overthrew Manuel Noriega in Panama. Maybe the reason we would bomb the bijous out of Bulgaria would be more "Weapons of Mass Destruction" such as with Iraq. Or, it might be because the CIA would prove, beyond a shadow of any Jewish doubt, that Bulgaria is a safe haven for terrorists. In fact, we would probably already have many Special Forces teams deployed inside of Bulgaria, arming and training a group of disgruntled Bulgarians on the art of making bombs, and how to best kill a politician. You see, America is against terrorism. Why, our idiot from Texas has said so on TV many times. We are the biggest exporter of International Covert Operations. The US State Department kills more people before 9am every morning than Osama bin Laden could ever dream of. But, this isn't terrorism. No sir. These are highly trained, carefully selected US patriots, usually ex-military, in one of the many alphabet agencies, who, like double-07, are authorized to kill people. They are sent to foreign counties to help train people to foster violent revolution and to create political instability. This is now openly talked about in the case of Iraq. The US Special Forces had been training the Kurds in northern Iraq for many years and supplying them with money and weapons to wage a war against a sovereign government that never, ever did anything against America. In fact, Saddam Hussein and his Baath Party were our friends in the 1980s. You can pick up an old issue of Time magazine from 1985, and read how these Jewish reporters shower praise over Iraq. The US taxpayers, via many of our "covert" alphabet agencies, supplied a couple of billion dollars to Saddam Hussein during that time.

So, in a normal act of Jewish gratitude, we wage not one, but two wars against Iraq, because they were our allies and helped us by waging war against the hated Iranians. I'm sorry if this is sounding a little bit confusing, but does anyone on the planet trust a Jew, after all the pointless harm they cause to everyone on the planet?

So again, we must ask, why did we go to war against Iraq? Besides the obvious, conquering the Middle-East for the Jewish regional hegemony, there is no reason for us to be there.

Yet, the majority of Americans now knows this and wants to leave, but the Jews never quit. They will abuse all forms of power at their disposal, whenever they have any power, and they want us to now kill a lot of people in Iran and Syria. So, when will we start attacking those countries? Actually, we already are. Just as the CIA overthrew the elected Ukrainian government and put a Jew servant in charge, complete with a loyal staff of Jews, the same is going on in Iran and Syria.

The Iranians have a pretty good defense system in place though. They openly have a system in which a group of hardcore Iranian nationals can veto the government. This group is a religious body and it does appear that the CIA has a much more difficult time infiltrating and screwing up a religious group than their preferred target, which is a democracy.

In the CIA game book of how to ruin a country and take over, there must be a list of various game plans. The preferred method is to get a democracy in place and allow International media to open offices there. Without these two factors the CIA just creates chaos and discord to the level that these CIA case officers in charge are so fond of doing.

Now, if we look back at our theoretical example of Bulgaria, with the Nationalistic Party called "Attack." If they were to sweep into power this year, without any violence, with a clear majority of support from the Bulgarians, they would in all probability find themselves the target of US Covert Operations. In fact, the US might even use the pretext, behind a close door meeting, to take up Covert Operations against Bulgaria as a means to prevent the spread of terrorism. Amazing how convoluted the minds in the US State Department are, but these are not just a group of Harvard and Yale graduates. No, these are a group of Jew-led Harvard and Yale graduates that have no, absolutely no, political world vision, beyond obeying the orders from the Jews in charge.

I would guess that any nationalistic group that takes over in a White country would face the CIA "Serbian plan." The CIA would send in US Special Forces and CIA ground agents. The SF groups would get together with Gypsies or Turkish minorities, maybe a Zionist Communist faction of ethnic Bulgarians, and train them in the art of pyrotechnics and assassination. After a few outrages, the Bulgarian nationalistic government would be driven to enforce normal civilized law, and crack down on the terrorists. The US media would always avoid calling this group 'terrorist,' but rather would refer to them as a persecuted minority, intellectual dissidents, even if they were dumb like a stump, or perhaps my favorite Orwellian title that the Jew media uses: "Pro-Western Democrats." I tell you, there is nothing better to hear other than some "Pro-West Democratic group" just fell on hard times. I mean, who does the Jew media think they are kidding here?

I say to myself as I'm sure most of you do, "Hot Damn" there are pro-West Democrats in Tajikistan that are demanding democratic elections. "Golly gee, what can I do to help these Democrats?" Aside from the fact that I've never in my life even talked to a Tajikistaner, and I have no idea how to even say the proper conjugation for a citizen of Tajikistan, I'm so happy that Condoleeza Rice has made it her priority to use the full weight of the US State Department to back "Pro-West Democrats" in Tajikistan. You know, the really sad part is, there are probably a half a dozen Tajikistan restaurants in Toronto, Canada.

But, as the Jew media loves to remind us daily, don't worry about White people. Don't worry about being overwhelmed and disposed by the huge number of foreigners who pour into our lands. Don't worry about the cultural displacement and genocide here in our own cities. No, instead, let's all get on our hands and knees and pray for democratic election in Tajikistan. I tell you "Hot Damn." If it wasn't for the Jews and their Jewish Master plan for world domination, we wouldn't even know about these wonderful countries. They would mind their business, we ours, no problem.

But, it is not going to end any time soon. We all know this. The US government will continue to be the world's largest exporter of Terrorism, using the Orwellian title of "Covert Operations." A White country like Bulgaria would be attacked secretly at first to try and destabilize it. If this didn't work, we would bomb the country into submission. The US media would tell everyone that we are against terrorism and the public would, in the shallowest way, accept this. Then the same media might run an in-depth report on how a CIA officer was killed in Afghanistan. In this in-depth news story, the media will calmly state that the CIA had been working in Afghanistan for years prior to the 9-11 attack. The American public will hear this and many will actually be happy to hear that we had spies in Afghanistan, but they will not draw the proper conclusion on their own. They will not say, "What was that? We had our CIA agents and Special Forces teams in Afghanistan prior to 9-11? Then, doesn't that mean that they were doing something secretly in the sovereign country of Afghanistan?"

And, how is it possible for America to conduct a secret military operation in a sovereign country and not be anything other than TERRORISM? How indeed. But, Americans are not political enthusiasts and don't think along those lines, not often anyway. Americans will spend a fortune on tickets to the NASCAR races. Americans will line up by the millions to watch a football game between people they will never even meet. Americans will sit back and watch six hours of TV, every day for the rest of their natural lives, but will not look analytically at US foreign policy. This allows the Jews to use US resources to wage these covert wars all over the world.

I remember when I was backpacking in Eastern Europe five years ago after the US bombed Serbia for the first time. I was so happy to see these all-White cities. I was so happy to see White people acting White, to come across millions of White people whose culture was not yet poisoned by MTV and race-mixing. And everywhere I went there were slogans spray painted on walls against US Imperialism. Even non-Slavic people, such as in Hungary, had so much anger towards America. I must have explained to 100 Slavs that it was the Jews who run America that caused this and that I personally loved the Serbs as my fellow Whiteman, that I hated US foreign policy, and that was enough to make friends with them. But the simple fact remains: Covert Operations are a huge part of the CIA and the US State Department's day-to-day functions. Covert Operations are simply state- sponsored terrorism. The rest of the world sees the American hand openly when we commit acts of terrorism under the guise of 'Covert Operations.' The abuses of the CIA and the US State Department need to come to a close and be accounted for. The only way we can end our War against Terrorism, is to end the US practice of conducing Terrorism under the guise of Covert Ops.

Thank you for being with me today.

This is Shaun Walker, for the National Alliance.