An American soldier in Iraq




Hello again, and welcome to American Dissident Voices. I'm Erich Gliebe.

Last week, we recounted a brief history of the current problems between the Arabs and the Jews in the Middle East.

As I said at that time, the formation of Israel was a very late development in Middle Eastern affairs, occurring in 1948. We also discussed last week that during the early decades of the 20th Century, influential Jews throughout the United States and Europe were able to manipulate their Gentile hosts into securing a Zionist state for them on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean.

And ever since, the Israelis and the Arabs have fought with words and weapons over that land. The Arab peoples believe that land to be rightfully theirs, since it WAS theirs for many centuries. They feel betrayed by the West, firstly because the Western powers were the last to control the region before handing it over to the Jews, and secondly because of the West's lopsided treatment of the situation, always to the benefit of the Israelis and always to the detriment of the Arabs.

But the most guilty of the Western powers is the United States. While the European nations have dealt more even-handedly with both the Arabs and the Jews, the U.S. has been slavishly pro-Jewish, to the point now that no one in Washington denies it. Most politicians don't even sugar-coat the fact that America will stand in defense of Israel... for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health. It is becoming increasingly obvious that Israel is getting the "for better," "for richer," and "in health" portions, while the U.S. is getting the "for worse," "for poorer," and "in sickness" portions.

It was the U.S. who saved Israel in 1973, when a coalition of Arab nations attacked Israel in an effort to regain territory lost during the Six-Day War of 1967. For nearly two days, the Arab forces recorded victory after victory. But then-President Nixon initiated Operation Nickel Grass, during which more than 20,000 tons of supplies -- tanks, artillery, and ammunition -- were airlifted from U.S. forces in Europe and delivered to Israel. Had the Soviets attacked Europe at that time -- and, in 1973, the Red Army was almost certainly superior to anything NATO could muster -- that 20,000 tons of equipment might have been the difference between a free and a communist Europe. At any rate, my point is that, the U.S. willingly and seriously depleted its European forces to save Israel.

And down to the present day, the United States does everything in its power to prop up Israel, the nation that snubs its nose at everyone else. Five years ago, President Bush went along with his Jewish advisors and attempted to tie Saddam Hussein to the attacks of September 11, 2001. He lied to the American public many times about Hussein. He told us that Saddam had stockpiled huge stores of "Weapons of Mass Destruction." He told us that Saddam had tried to secure uranium from Africa and hinted that Iraq was intent on constructing a nuclear arsenal. He told us that Saddam had partially financed the 9/11 attacks. Lies. All lies.

But by the time we found out they were lies, American troops were already in Afghanistan and Iraq. We had redeemed those two sovereign nations from "tyranny" and had dragged them kicking and screaming down the rosy path of "democracy" which -- from everything that we hear on the news -- has a lot of thorns...big thorns.

But the "saving from despotism" and "installing democracy" that the U.S. is doing in Iraq and Afghanistan DOES have other benefits. Unfortunately, not a single one of those benefits is for America. They aren't for the American families whose taxes are paying for those wars and whose sons and husbands are losing limbs and lives because of roadside bombs.

The real tangible benefits are being reaped by Israel. Remember that Iraq under Hussein was the only large-scale and organized military power in the Middle East besides Israel. That Iraq is no more. In its place is an Iraq divided by civil war, fighting itself and fighting the American occupation forces. Even if the U.S. pulled completely out of Iraq today, how many years would it take before Iraq could again rival Israel as a power in the Middle East? It would be several decades at least before Iraq -- which has traditionally been pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli -- could be cemented into a large and organized power.

This isn't to say, with Iraq and Afghanistan's Taliban fighting the occupation forces, that Israel has no more enemies in the Middle East. On the contrary, every non-Jew in the Middle East is an enemy of Israel. The Palestinians have been fighting a low-level war against Israel for who knows how long. Egyptian, Jordanian, and Syrian forces were allied in open war against Israel in 1967 and 1973. Iran, particularly since the Islamic Republic was founded in the early 1980s, has been a thorn in Israel's side. And each day for the last couple of weeks, the news comes in that Hezbollah, with its position of power in southern Lebanon, is clashing with Israel.

Let's briefly recount the facts about this latest Middle East war. Allegedly, Hezbollah kidnapped two Israeli soldiers and killed eight others in a cross-border raid on July 12. After refusing to exchange any of the many thousands of Arab freedom fighters locked up in Israeli prisons for the two kidnapped soldiers, Israel then launched a massive offensive north on Lebanon -- complete with aircraft, tanks, armored cars, and bulldozers.

To most observers, this degree of retaliation on the part of Israel goes way beyond a "proportional response." A proportional response is the idea that in the international sphere, it's okay to give a tit for a tat. It's kind of a gentleman's code of conduct between powers; if you slap us in the face, you shouldn't get your feathers too ruffled if we slap you back. On the other hand, a slap in the face isn't enough to warrant our turning your whole country into a nuclear inferno.

But no one denies that the Jews are a distinctive people -- least of all, them. And their idea of a proportional response is -- like Jews themselves -- unique. They have mobilized the entire Israeli armed forces because of two alleged kidnappings and eight alleged murders that took place in a region that has been the site of border skirmishes for decades.

Based on the Israeli reaction, what do you think should be a "proportional response" against Israel by the combined armed forces of Ukraine and Russia, given that thousands of women from those countries have been kidnapped or tricked and taken to Israel where they meet an ignoble end as prostitutes? An article on foxnews.com from August of 2004 estimated that about 3,000 foreign women are brought to work in Israel's sex industry every year, for a net annual profit of more than $40 million.

But the leaders in Washington stop up their ears when it comes to criticizing Israel or dealing it its just desserts. Sure, some of them oppose President Bush in his insane wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but I can't think of a single one who has anything really bad to say about Israel. With regard to the Arab-Israeli situation, their attitudes range from more-or-less neutral to ardently pro-Israel. Nobody in Washington is outspoken in his criticism of Israel and his support of the Palestinians and other Arabs.

There are two main reasons for the lopsidedness in favor of Israel in Washington. One is that the American media are largely in Jewish hands, and the second is that the Jews in the United States are on top of things when it comes to background checks on office-seekers. Any political candidate perceived by the Jews as an enemy of Israel will quickly find himself the subject of a massive smear campaign, and he will lose the election if he doesn't voluntarily withdraw from the campaign before Election Day.

So America is the Bully Boy for Israel. Whatever Israel wants or does, the U.S. stands ready to sing Israel's praises or push the dissidents around. When Israel sent its ground forces into southern Lebanon last week, our toadying Chief Executive refused to put up any kind of staying hand to Israel, instead laying all the blame on the Arabs:

"Secretary Rice will make it clear that resolving the crisis demands confronting the terrorist group that launched the attacks and the nations that support it."

Unfortunately for the Israelis, I believe that, in the long run, their invasion of Lebanon will fail. Sure, they might severely cripple the capabilities of Hezbollah temporarily. They'll kill a few thousand Arabs and lose a few hundred of their own soldiers.

But it seems that the Israelis and George Bush suffer from the same false notion. That false notion is: "If we kill enough 'terrorists,' all will be well."

Nothing could be further from the truth. Killing so-called "terrorists," far from sapping the will of the survivors, only strengthens their determination to succeed. Rooting out terrorists allows the survivors to say to each other, with some degree of truth: "See? The enemies of our people are determined to destroy us and our way of life. We must carry on with the fight." Short of turning the entire Middle East into a huge sheet of plate glass from a well-placed series of hydrogen bombs, there will always be plenty of young Arabs willing to fight and die in the fight against the Jewish "infidels."

No; trying to control a noncompliant group of people -- like what U.S. forces have been trying to do in Iraq and like what Israel is starting to do in Lebanon -- that's no way to destroy one's enemies, long-term. If you want freedom from your enemies, you've got to get them off your turf. Round them up and send them packing, if you will, but you can't destroy an entire group by shooting and stabbing. That's why we in the National Alliance are working toward a White homeland. We're not out to exterminate anybody; we just want our own turf.

If George Bush continues his shooting-and-stabbing strategy in Iraq, it is a certainty that he will fail in his plan to bring the so-called "terrorists" under control.

If Israel continues its shooting-and-stabbing strategy in the Middle East, it is a certainty that the result will be constant warfare and turmoil, as has been the case since Israel's inception in 1948.

If you want to destroy an entire group (as opposed to just pushing them off your turf), you've got to do it slowly enough that no one really notices. The problem with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades is that everyone can see what's happening, and they fight against it. Even when people die, the stories of heroism are passed on to the next generation, inspiring it to continue fighting and perhaps earning for itself new stories of heroism.

So rather than active destruction, it seems to me that the best way to destroy one's enemies -- and here, I mean to wipe them off the face of the planet, not just move them away from you -- the best way to destroy them is to do it slowly. Organize your group, and wield as much power as you can. In particular, do everything you can to be able to manipulate public opinion as you see fit. And make sure you have some degree of control over the government.

Once you've got media and government power, soften up your enemies by getting them accustomed to things that will destroy them in the end. Get them to like these things, if you can, and preferably get them to finance your prosperity and their destruction. Get them to allow as many people of foreign race as possible into their living space. Teach them that being exclusive -- particularly with regard to race -- is wrong. Promote intermarriage and the adoption of foreign babies by same-race couples who can't conceive.

This is a long and exhausting strategy for completely destroying your enemies, but it WILL work. And, hey: Who ever expected genocide to be easy? Even if it isn't completely successful, your enemies will certainly be severely weakened, and then maybe the time has arrived for you to finish them off by stabbing and shooting.

Whether by accident or by conscious design, the position of the Jews in the world today relative to our people is precisely what I have just described. They have acquired their own organized racial state, in which only Jews can be citizens. They have taken control over much of the American media and all of its most influential political leaders. Of all the ways they could use their media power, they most often choose to use it to promote race-mixing and non-White immigration.

And they have manipulated the West into providing for their needs. According to the online Jewish Virtual Library, since 1948 the U.S. has sent almost $100 billion to Israel, not including certain "special projects" and many billions in loan guarantees (nearly all of which have been forgiven). Untold billions have been extorted from Europe since the end of the Second World War, and not just from Germany. By repeatedly playing the so-called "Holocaust" card, even neutral nations like Switzerland have been made to ante up to Israel and to Jews who have remained in the West.

The worst part of this entire situation is that the United States is completely under the thumb of Israel. In this newest of Arab-Jewish wars between Hezbollah and Israel, our government won't even give the time of day to the Arabs. We are firmly behind the Jews. This is wrong and must stop.

The blame for this latest war is as much on the United States as it is on Israel. We have financed Israel from Day One. We have equipped her military. We have fought her wars, both on the battlefield and in the meeting rooms of international diplomacy. We have been the Bully Boy for Israel, and it's time to cut her loose, to sink or swim as she will. If she wants to swagger around the Middle East "packin' heat and lightin' 'em up," she ought to do it on her own two feet.

And it's time for White people worldwide to get over their fears of Political Correctness and social ostracism, and to join with us in doing what we all know to be right: to attain White living space, in which - for lack of a better descriptor -- we can just "be White." We aren't going to expect the Jews to do one single thing for us when we have our White homeland, and we need to get both them and ourselves prepared for the day when the feeding tubes to Israel are cut for good. If Israel can survive then... fine. It's not our concern. Our race is.

Join with me and the other Whites of goodwill in helping the National Alliance lead our people to a better future.

Thanks for being with me today.