Like every White nation, France is quite troubled these days.




Hello and welcome back to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

During this past week, France held its once-every-five-years' presidential election. The winner was declared to be Nicolas Sarkozy, a conservative who had served the outgoing French president Jacques Chirac for four years as his interior minister. Sarkozy defeated Socialist candidate Segolene Royal by a healthy margin.

Surprisingly, the conservative Sarkozy fared well among women voters, gaining 52% of that vote. He also fared well among blue-collar Frenchmen, even gaining a majority of the vote in the once-industrial north of France, which hadn't voted for a rightist presidential candidate since Charles de Gaulle carried the region more than forty years ago, in 1965. The broad spectrum of the French population that Sarkozy appealed to surprised most all pollsters.

So it is clear that many French voters are pleased about the election of Sarkozy and see him as someone who stands for things they have come to believe in. Historically, Sarkozy has always taken a tough stance on illegal immigration and on crime. Millions of White Frenchmen wholeheartedly support Sarkozy in his positions on those issues, but certain segments of the French population are not at all keen about possible measures that they envision Sarkozy taking. This is especially true for those allegedly "French" communities -- namely, non-White communities, mostly Muslim and with a Middle East or North African heritage -- that are built around one or both of those ideas: illegal immigration and crime. Since the results of the election have been made known, there have already been demonstrations in various regions of the country by those who oppose the draconian measures they believe will be taken against them by the new administration.

Sarkozy, for his part, has sought to allay those fears and has tried to make it clear to all of France that no drastic measures will be taken. He encouraged the people of France to unite for change and against intolerance. He has called his election a "victory of democracy" and has tried to deflect criticism by drawing attention instead to his hope that France will once again become a proud and patriotic nation, a true leader in the international community of nations. He said, "I want France to start moving again... I want the French to feel proud again." He also has said that he wants France to be a strong partner for the United States, a position that the inward-looking French people haven't yet completely warmed up to.

Well, I hate to sound like the proverbial pessimist, but it is my sincere belief that all of Sarkozy's political hot air about re-instilling a sense of French pride will ultimately be wasted, and that the fears of the non-French immigrant communities are completely unfounded. For a mere French politician to reinvigorate a dying and racially-polyglot France? For a mere French politician to bring a sense of unity and purpose to the multiracial disaster that IS France today? For a mere French politician to somehow get the existing immigrant communities in France "on board" such that the members of those communities would miraculously choose Sarkozy's program for a patriotic France over their loyalty to their racial kinsmen, both those in France already as well as those in the home country who yet hope to feast on the fat of Europe? I don't think so. None of those issues can even be touched until the race question is brought to the table, and it is against the law to even compile any racial data in France, much less try to find a true and workable solution to the country's racial mess.

No, those who are pinning their hopes of a French national revival on Sarkozy are destined for disappointment, and those who see in Sarkozy's conservatism and tough talk a grave threat to certain -- particularly non-White -- segments of France have nothing to fear. When push comes to shove, Sarkozy will prove to be a mainstream politician, as have so many others, who will talk with the best of them but in the long run do nothing for the real good of France. Barring anything short of a radical racial program, France will remain on its present path, a path of White racial humiliation and destruction long ago described by French novelist Jean Raspail in his frightful book, The Camp of the Saints.

And as long as a mass democracy that is well-oiled by the media rules the roost, the simple and well-meaning White voters of France (at least while their numerical superiority holds out) will just continue to elect so-called "leaders" who, they hope, will lead their nation back to the point of shining again as a beacon of culture throughout Europe and the world. Sadly, because of the control wielded by a White-hating media, most Frenchmen will remain ignorant as to the true cause of their nation's woes and their own frustrations. And even if a minority of perceptive Frenchmen begins to suspect the true cause of those woes, the pervasive media pressure will serve to stifle any debate or discussion on the subject.

Obviously, as a racialist, I believe that the ultimate cause of the decline of France is a racial one. And that also means that I believe that the salvation of France lies in a White racialist solution. I believe that if all the non-Whites in France were made to leave, France would be much better off. In fact, I believe that if France became all-White again (like it once was) that the nation named for the mighty Germanic tribe that gave us Charles "The Hammer" Martel -- and his grandson Charlemagne -- would become the new superpower of Europe.

If, by some miracle, France DID become all-White again, the two other traditional European powers, Germany and Britain, which are both declining for the same essential reasons that France is -- namely, racial reasons -- would be hard-pressed to explain to their own disgruntled White citizens why it is that France was able to solve her racial problems, but their nations weren't. In fact, every government of Europe might have some explaining to do to its citizens, who might be fed up with the multiracial status quo and clamor for change. But more on that later.

Now, I'm not seeing a White racial revolution in France in the immediate future, although I'd be the first to acknowledge the greatness of such an accomplishment. And I don't believe that an all-White France (or an all-White Anywhere) would be a stress-free utopia, a place without problems of any kind. There would still be the endemic economic issues -- unemployment rates, domestic production versus foreign imports, and poverty, for example. There would be problems in education, with the environment, and in a hundred other areas as well. But a racially-pure and nationalist France would be a force to be reckoned with, especially with such a France standing among the bent-backed and feeble nations that make up the rest of the White world. France would be the young and strong bull with fire in his eyes, and the old and brittle bulls around him would take care to give him his distance.

At least that's what the old and brittle bulls did when Adolf Hitler brought youth and vigor back to a Germany that had been deflated by the ridiculous terms of the Versailles Treaty following the First World War. When Hitler decided that a disarmed nation was a historical nothing, he went right ahead and restored the military might of Germany, and may the terms of the immoral Versailles Treaty be damned. When Hitler decided that it was time to restore to the Fatherland the European territory inhabited by ethnic Germans that had been stolen from Germany in 1918, he went right ahead and did so by whatever means necessary, whether that was by diplomacy, arm-twisting, or seizure. And the old men of Europe -- in Britain and France, that is -- stood out of the way, more or less powerless to stop him at first.

And they only succeeded in defeating Hitler and the youthful Germany by ganging up on them to the point that it is almost laughable that any American, Russian, Englishman, or Frenchmen should feel a sense of pride today in their nation's defeat of Germany during the Second World War. More appropriate would be a sense of shame for being one of the countless, mind-numbed sheep who by the deadweight strength of numbers alone -- and not by strength of character or intellect -- subdued a lion far superior to themselves in every conceivable way.

But anyway, a young and vigorous France is hard to imagine. We're talking about the country that had widespread troubles with mutiny during the latter half of World War I and was steamrolled by the Wehrmacht in six short weeks during World War II.

Those historical troubles, coupled with France's reluctance a few years ago to join George W. Bush in his insane boot-stomping expedition in Afghanistan and Iraq, have given France the reputation of being a sissy among the flag-waving, chest-pounding blowhards who like to think of themselves as "patriotic" Americans. Have you heard the joke about the two geography students talking? One said, "What's the flag of France look like?" The other replied, "It's red, white, and blue." To which the first came back with, "Are you sure? I thought it was just white."

Humor is one thing, but I don't think the White men of France are sissies; they just haven't found something to get REALLY fired up about for the last century or so. And you know, with the immigration problems France has experienced over especially the last few years, maybe that day is coming soon. Maybe the White men of France will show that they've still got a few drops of the blood of the legendary Frankish warrior Roland in their veins.

But if that day is right around the corner, a conservative like Nicolas Sarkozy won't be the one to lead them. From a racialist perspective, conservatism is half-measures, and half-measures won't cut it. We need radical racialism, and I don't know if France is the one to get the ball rolling, but someone's got to do it. We in the National Alliance are trying to do that in the Western Hemisphere, with mixed success so far, but that hasn't deterred us.

You know, it's interesting to consider what could happen if and when some White nation takes the bull by the horns and gets its racial situation under control. Maybe it's France, maybe it's the Netherlands, but let's say it happens. One of two things will follow. Either all the rest of Europe will gang up on the loose cannon -- as they did against Germany during World War II -- or other nations will follow suit in a kind of racially-cleansing domino effect.

As strongly as most of the European power structure would want to gang up on the White nation, I find it difficult to believe that the Whites of Europe would allow that to happen. The reason I say that is that White racial awareness in Europe has been at a record high over the past few years, with mainstream political candidates emerging with openly anti-immigration platforms. As much as the laws restrict free speech, the essentials of what needs to be said are being said...very carefully. But everyone knows the score. The people are looking for racial leadership, but they have no example to follow. If given that example from even a single nation, the result might well be a massive non-White exodus from Europe and a whole host of regenerated White nations. It's certainly a pleasant thought.

But despite his resounding victory, neither Nicolas Sarkozy nor his ordinary conservatism can right the wrongs of France today. France's ills go far too deep for the mass democracy that came into vogue at the end of the 20th Century to be able to fix them -- the type of mass democracy based on debate, inaction, big talk, and the preserving of appearances. Such a democracy can only result in a slow death of nations, as has been demonstrated by countless examples over the last hundred years, at least.

Of course, all of the criticism I've been heaping upon France... I might as well have been heaping it on the United States, Britain, or almost any other White Western country today. All of them, to some degree or another, suffer from the same sorts of ills that plague France: lack of national pride and unified purpose, and an internally-warring population divided along many lines, the most important of which is race. All nations of the West, if they are to survive, must solve these problems, and such a solution will -- by necessity -- take us out of the warm and cozy comfort zone that has stifled our ability to act while simultaneously driving our nations over the brink.

So, no matter where you live, when Nicolas Sarkozy's conservative plan for France fails, make sure you understand why. When Nicolas Sarkozy's conservative plan for France fails, make sure you understand what SHOULD have been done instead -- and what NEEDS to be done instead. And right now -- TODAY -- even before Nicolas Sarkozy's conservative plan for France fails, look for a racialist plan in your own country, and then get involved in the implementation of that plan.

The National Alliance has such a plan, and we're trying with baby steps to inch it toward reality. No matter what you have believed in the past, if you have now come to accept the reality of race -- and the truth that all mainstream political philosophies suffer from the ignorance of the natural desire for human groups to chart and seek their own destiny AS A GROUP -- then you need to consider joining the National Alliance.

Let's see if we can't score a success in some nation and perhaps start that domino effect. I look forward to hearing from you.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.