A dozen years ago, Fieldale Farms employed fewer than 100 Latinos. Today, Latinos total 3,000 in a 4,700-person workforce This company promo photo naturally shows White rather than Latino workers.

Hello again, and welcome back to this edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

In case you hadn't noticed, whenever any politician or aspiring-politician opens his mouth these days to talk about immigration, most of the time we get a bunch of spineless blather that has no real teeth in it. This is especially true for the Presidential hopefuls, both Republican and Democrat, who are elbowing each other and jockeying for first place in hopes of being the next alleged leader of the United States, with all the while it being well known to intelligent observers worldwide that the real seat of power isn't in the Oval Office, but is rather behind the scenes in Washington and in media board rooms all across the country.

With few exceptions, the Presidential hopefuls aren't overly-enthusiastic one way or the other with regard to the immigration debate. For one thing, they don't want to say anything that will be perceived as anti-immigrant, for fear of giving away the Latino bloc vote to another candidate. But on the other hand -- again with very few exceptions -- they don't want to seem to be so Latino-philic that they turn off the large segment of the White population that isn't quite sure that allowing America to be turned into a Third-World dump is the best course of action to take. So most of the Presidential hopefuls give us mealy-mouthed nothings, saying contradictory things like that we need to protect our borders but, at the same time, we need to realize the economic impact of all of the legal Latinos as well as the illegal ones, and so we need to keep our minds open about finding ways of integrating them into the larger American society.

This has been the basic position of essentially every President for several decades now. Jimmy Carter came down strongly on the side of legalizing everyone who was within the U.S. border at the time. In 1986, Ronald Reagan made a big to-do about strengthening borders and cracking down on employers who hired illegals, but all of that was just so much sing-song -- designed by the people around Reagan who could think -- in order to put middle White America at ease regarding illegal immigration. The fact that none of Reagan's policies had any teeth or were carried out to the extent that public opinion would have allowed back in 1986 was completely missed by most Whites twenty years ago. At the time, they just wanted the President to say something to reassure them, and that was enough.

So here we are, more than twenty years after the failed legislation of 1986, and President George W. Bush has been trying to ride the crests of the two waves that have been mutually exclusive up to this point: he is wanting to set the lawbreaking illegals on the road to American citizenship and, at the same time and out of the other side of his mouth, he is claiming that he'll beef up border security to keep the rest of the wretched refuse out.

We White racialists, though, having seen how the American people have been lied to over and over within our lifetimes and also having noticed that the status of the White race in the United States has experienced a corresponding decline in relative population size, political clout, and group consciousness… we will have none of it. George W. Bush -- like nearly every American President of recent memory -- has done NOT ONE SINGLE THING to protect this country from the waves of illegal immigrants that swarm across our borders at the rate of millions per year. If he really wanted to, President Bush could put teeth into the existing immigration laws and provide to law enforcement agencies the equipment, money, and manpower to take care of the problem. But he refuses.

Contrary to the laws of our country, he lets illegal immigrants enter our country uninvited, and then he refuses to round them up. On the off chance that local law enforcement officers DO round them up, no action is taken to ensure that the immigrants won't sneak back into the country illegally next week, or even tomorrow. If I remember correctly from my civics classes many years ago, it is the job of the legislature to MAKE the laws, the job of the judiciary to INTERPRET the laws, and the job of the executive branch (i.e., President Bush) to ENFORCE the laws. As a Chief Executive who orders his underlings to refuse to cooperate in the investigation dealing with the firing of federal attorneys, it seems like President Bush doesn't have much respect for the laws he is charged with upholding.

Anyway, just to clear up any misunderstanding, White racialists in general and National Alliance members in particular aren't going to be satisfied with preventing any more illegal immigrants from entering the United States. Nor are we going to be satisfied -- as I'll explain later -- with the rounding up and subsequent deportation of every single illegal immigrant who now lives in this country illegally. And that's because we are concerned about race.

There are millions and millions of non-Whites in the United States today who are full-fledged U.S. citizens but, because of their race, are lumped together with the illegals in the mind of the average mainstream White American. This is particularly true for legalized Latino citizens. Many Whites who see a group of Latinos together automatically assume that all of them are illegal immigrants, simply because the problem of illegal Latino immigration is so well-documented and prevalent that the simplest explanation upon seeing a group of Latinos is to believe that they are all illegals.

The diversity-mongers among us get into a terrible dither about such a situation. How coarse and rude that anyone (GASP!) would just ASSUME that every member of a group of Latinos was an illegal alien! How uncultured! How primitive!

You know, this might be one time where I'm inclined to agree with the diversity-mongers, at least to some degree. In normal humans of every race, looking at a group of people of another race induces an instinctual response, a mixture of curiosity and apprehension. This response, just like the multiculturalists claim, is definitely uncultured and primitive. To say that it is instinctual is to say that it goes beyond our powers of reason, beyond the conscious mind. Such a response doesn't require a conscious choice; it simply appears from the depths of one's being. "Put there by Nature," you might say, just as Nature put into the lion the desire for the flesh of giraffe, and just as Nature put into the giraffe the "fight or flight" urge upon the sighting of a lion.

All of this goes to the heart of the racialist worldview of the National Alliance, which subscribes to the conviction that the various races of Man should today be allowed to continue in distinct, monoracial homelands. In addition, I'd like to point out that the current "immigration" debate is, at root, a racial debate, despite what most opponents of illegal immigration might say to the contrary.

In this sense, those who advocate legalizing the 10 or 20 million illegal immigrants who are already acknowledged by the government to reside in the United States are correct when they state that opponents of that legalization are motivated by racism. Now, I will grant that, for many opponents of immigration, it is not a conscious form of racism, but rather simply a reaction based upon the recognition that Group A differs from Group B.

This is the same consciousness of race that causes every Black in a Black part of town to notice the White family in the minivan at the gas station, obviously having taken a wrong turn only to find themselves on the other side of the tracks. Whether or not those Blacks intend to help or harm, the fact that the attention of the Blacks was unduly drawn to that White family is evidence of an awareness on the part of the Blacks of differences between various human groups. And from the point of view of the National Alliance, that's what White racialism is: A recognition of racial distinctness and a desire to maintain that distinctness.

The opposition to illegal immigration is exactly an instinctual type of response that I mentioned earlier in this broadcast. It isn't a vindictive, hateful racism that drives the opponents of illegal immigration. The innate recognition of racial differences brings out the instinctual response of keeping one's own race unmixed with other races. And for most Americans today, due to excessive external incentives, that instinct of group integrity remains at the unconscious level, even while action that is related to that instinct is taken by the conscious mind.

It sounds like a bizarre situation, this conflict between the conscious mind and the unconscious instincts that Nature programmed into us, but it is no different from the liberal parents who advocate "rights" for homosexuals, but who are aghast when they first are told that their daughter is a lesbian. Reason and instinct conflict. Reason has told these parents that, in principle, they should have no argument about the sex of the person someone falls in love with, but the instinct that these people have for years tried to snuff out wakes up with a roar when those fanciful notions hit close to home, with one's own children.

Other examples along the same line are White parents who sincerely believe themselves to be nonracialist until, for example, Johnny brings home an Asian fiancé. Here again, reason and instinct conflict. And though some White parents eventually claim to have come to grips with such situations, I don't believe that to be true. When reality is found to be in conflict with instinct -- which is the guide for living that Nature put within us -- tension and stress are bound to result. I attribute the unease that pervades all White societies of the West today to the stark and often frightening discrepancy between society and the instincts held within the White race-soul.

The National Alliance, of course, is out to make reality match with instinct. That is, we want to make the guiding principles of our society match the instinctual guiding principles that Nature built into individuals of White ancestry. Those principles -- which, incidentally, are common to all races -- are based on the idea that the races should not be combined and thus destroyed, but rather separated and thus will be free to continue to grow and flourish as fits their own inner nature.

Now, to do that, the National Alliance needs White people who consciously recognize and accept the accuracy of the "separateness" instinct. Such people are regarded today by the media Jews who influence public opinion as hateful and ignorant bigots, and the media Jews waste no time in smearing our ideology and our character in front of the public. And they do that precisely BECAUSE they want everyone else to march in ideological lockstep down the path of racial dissolution and destruction.

So the illegal immigration debate today is really not about jobs or higher health care costs or the English/Spanish chaos in the public schools. For the men and women of the National Alliance and for all Whites who care about the future of their people the world over, it's about race.

And it is RACE -- more than it is illegal immigration -- that concerns thousands of communities all over the United States. True, it is easiest to attribute all of the recent problems in these communities to "illegals" -- generally Latinos from south of the border -- but, as I've said elsewhere, it isn't the Latino illegals that are the problem: It is the Latino illegals… and their legal brothers… and their legal sisters…and their legal children… and so on. In other words, it is not an illegal immigration issue. It is a race issue.

Gainesville, Georgia has made the national news numerous times over the last several years because it is a good example of what can happen to a community if it gets deluged with Latino immigrants. An article printed in the Washington Post more than a year ago (on April 3, 2006) gives a pretty good rundown of what has happened in Gainesville. The article was written by Peter Slevin and is entitled "Town's-Eye View of Immigration Debate." It is still available for viewing online.

Here are some of the numbers in Gainesville, according to the article. I'll quote writer Peter Slevin directly…

"Since 1990, the official population has nearly doubled to 32,000 and the number of Hispanics has quadrupled to compose nearly half the registered population -- and far more when illegal immigrants are considered."

In other words, if the illegals in Gainesville could be counted -- and Slevin's article makes no mention of anybody trying to count them -- then the Latino population of Gainesville, Georgia is much more than half of the population. Slevin continues further on in his article, where he discusses the Fieldale chicken processing plant in Gainesville:

"A dozen years ago, Fieldale employed fewer than 100 Hispanics. Today, Hispanics total 3,000 in a 4,700-person workforce that transforms live birds by the thousand into boneless chicken flesh."

And one more quote:

"… Gainesville Elementary greets one new student a day in a school already 70 percent Hispanic. Nine in 10 students qualify for subsidized meals."

This is the reality in Gainesville. Keep in mind that Peter Slevin's article appeared in the Washington Post fifteen months ago. To the best of my knowledge, the Latino invasion hasn't slowed down in the last year. If anything, it has grown in intensity, which means that today Gainesville is even more non-White than Peter Slevin's article suggests.

But not only is it the reality in Gainesville, it is the reality in thousands of other communities across the country, many of them small, agricultural towns that have now been transformed into nests of Mexican immigrants.

The National Alliance believes that illegal immigration into the United States must be completely stopped. Those illegals who are presently in the United States must be rounded up and sent home, never to return.

But we aren't going to stop there. Because we view the world through the lens of race, ALL non-Whites -- legal or otherwise; Latino, Black, Asian, or otherwise -- must be displaced from a geographical region that will act as a White homeland here in the Western Hemisphere. We need your support in the securing of that homeland. And if we don't get our act together soon, our whole country will suffer the fate of Gainesville, Georgia.

So, in this year leading up to the U.S. Presidential election, start asking around about why our politicians won't support the separation of our society by race. It would certainly be more conducive to peace, stability, and progress than what we have now.

I'll end with a slogan that we use in the National Alliance: "Stop the hate. Separate."

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me today.