Obama says he is changing the way the US interacts with South and Central American, but he isn't changing how the US interacts with Israel.





Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

According to last week's media reports, President Barack Obama is really turning over some new leaves with regard to America's relationship with the Latin American countries to the south. At the so-called "Summit of the Americas" in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad this past week, Obama did his best to smooth over some of the old anger that the leaders of Latin American countries have been feeling towards the gringos for the last -- oh, I don't know -- six hundred years or so, ever since Columbus accidentally "discovered" something that he wasn't even looking for.

Lots of White men -- mostly Spaniards and Portuguese -- followed Columbus into the Caribbean and Central and South America, of course, and they spent the next few centuries searching for gold and slapping the Indians around. Unfortunately, most of the Whites didn't bring their own women with them and so they shortsightedly took and interbred with the native women, which led to the creation of the mestizos (White-Indian mongrels) which still populate a good portion of the region.

And while the English settlers to the north -- who HAD brought their women with them -- organized a new and powerful nation, the Whites, Indians, and mestizos to the south failed to unify their dissimilarities enough to offer much of a resistance to Anglo-American domination. While the United States became strong, industrialized, and imperialistic, the countries of Latin America languished behind and were essentially the butt of all the jokes about the Western Hemisphere.

Of course, now it is the United States that is the butt of all of the jokes about the Western Hemisphere, but the Latin American leaders still nurse a large degree of resentment about American meddling in their internal affairs and about American economic pressure, among other things.

For example, there is the long-standing hullaballoo over communist Cuba, against whom the United States has had a trade embargo for 47 years. That embargo came about as a result of the Cuban missile crisis and the failed Bay of Pigs military operation. We have stuck our noses into the affairs of Latin American politics and the drug cartels, supporting this or that political leader if it seemed to suit our purpose of nipping either communism or drug production in the bud.

Of course, all of those efforts have failed miserably, and drugs produced in South and Central America are still finding their way onto America's streets, where sometimes gangs get into shooting wars with each other or with the cops about control of the distribution networks. Obviously, our ousting of the Taliban from power in Afghanistan hasn't helped in this regard, as the Taliban used medieval justice in its wars against Afghanistan's opium industry. Now that that hammer is gone, the opium farmers are planting and harvesting bumper crops of the stuff. But that's another story.

What I don't understand is why the United States can't turn off the tap of drugs flowing into this country. I'm not a law enforcement specialist, but it seems to me that, despite all of the TALK of the folks running the show in Washington, D.C., we really don't WANT to stop the drugs coming in. It just can't be as hard as we are making it out to be. But anyway…

In Trinidad this past week, President Obama did his best to use his powers of persuasion to open some new doors with the disgruntled leaders in Latin America. He shook a lot of hands, promised the Latin American leaders to take measures to increase security in the Caribbean, develop alternative energy sources, fight global warming, and promote a new economic package for the entire Western Hemisphere.

Obama accepted the gift of a book from the spunky leader of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, who had a long-standing grudge match with America's last Chief Executive, George W. Bush. Chavez gets the award for "Best One-Liner" from the conference for his statement: "I think President Obama is an intelligent man, compared to the previous U.S. president."

Anyway, the title of the book Chavez gave President Obama says it all about Latin American attitudes with regard to the larger White world: The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent, by Eduardo Galeano. Despite the chip-on-the-shoulder title, Chavez was encouraged by Obama's openness and spirit of respect, going so far as to suggest that the next summit take place in Havana, Cuba.

Not everyone melted to the melodious sounds of Obama's pledges, however. According to an AP article by Mark Smith, Bolivia President Evo Morales said that… "Obama's pledge of a new era of mutual respect toward Latin America rings hollow."

Well, Obama is breaking out of the mold set by President Bush by being more open with the nations of Latin America. You might remember that Obama pledged to stress new talks with nations like Iran and North Korea, whom former President George W. Bush dubbed a part of "the axis of evil." A crimp was put in that effort last week when Roxana Saberi, an Iranian-American reporter from North Dakota who had been living in Iran for six years, was convicted by an Iranian judge on charges of spying for the United States. The sentence could carry the death penalty, and naturally President Obama is eager to not only save Saberi but also salvage his diplomatic efforts with the Islamic Republic.

At any rate, things are a bit different in Washington these days. At least on the surface, it appears that President Obama is trying to use diplomacy instead of threats to solve some of our rifts with nations we have historically had shaky ties with. Although I am not aware of the issue coming up for discussion at the Western Hemisphere conference in Trinidad last week, it would be interesting to see what kind of stance President Obama will take with regard to what White Americans see as our biggest problem with the nations to the south: immigration -- both legal and illegal -- and the related push to grant citizenship to illegals who are currently residing in the U.S. That last topic, which reared its ugly head during Bush's second term, has faded away for the moment, but it is only a matter of time before it resurfaces. What Obama does with that will tell a lot.

Based on all of this, one might think that President Obama would continue the trend and take a new look at positions and policies that have held the reins in America for quite a few years. But there IS a limit to Obama's willingness to turn over a new leaf, and you'll never guess what powerful group of people it involves. Well, if you have been listening to these broadcasts for a while, so that you have a good grasp on who possesses and wields the lion's share of the political power in the United States, maybe you will guess correctly. Is it any surprise that we are talking here about the Jews?

Sure enough, the more things change -- such as America's new outlook on Latin America -- the more things stay the same, such as with the Jews and their manipulating whomever they need to in order to get their way.

So Obama isn't afraid to try something new with Iran and the Latin American countries, but when it comes to the Jews, he has decided to leave well enough alone. This kowtowing to the Jews is evidenced by the decision by his administration to boycott the United Nations conference on racism that took place this past week in Geneva, Switzerland. The problem, at least from Obama's point of view, is that it is quite possible that the final document from the conference will criticize the rouge state of Israel for its well-evidenced and atrocious civil rights record.

This isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened, with the United States being the only dissenting voice among the United Nations with regard to Israel, and it is starting to get really old. Despite some revisions negotiated by the -- quote, "deeply grateful" unquote -- U.S. State Department, the final copy of recommendations is unacceptable to Israel and therefore unacceptable to President Obama.

Now this is a very unusual stance, coming from the nation that rams multiculturalism down the throats of all its citizens, young and old, and decries racism at every turn. The school curriculum, particularly in social studies, consists basically of teaching the White students to feel guilty about the actions of their ancestors and to stir up indignation among the non-White students. Virtually every commercial on television in the United States shows people from a variety of races enjoying each other's company. The same is true of sit-coms and films. In the cases in which a villain is a part of the script, it is invariably a White, although it isn't always White men anymore. White female villains are now an accepted part of the Jews arsenal of deceit in Hollywood. Despite all of this work against racism, the Black President of the United States holds out from a conference on racism due to the wording of a document that speaks ill of the tiny nation of Israel, with a population of about 7 million, although about 2 million of them don't count because they aren't Jews. Just think: A million more Jews in Israel and the Jewish population of Hate-Nation would reach the mythical 6 million figure. Cool.

Anyway, here again we see the two-faced nature of the Jewish Establishment in the United States, to which President Obama defers on all issues that impact the Jews. For the rest of us, the Jews in the media preach that racism is bad, bad, bad -- but among themselves, the Jews operate with a racism that is simply breathtaking. When Jews criticize the racist policies of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany, I am always somewhat amused by the brazenness of their accusations. At least in the Third Reich, everybody knew the score: Hitler made no secret that he believed the Jews had contributed to the political and economic weakening of Germany, not to mention their role in the communist destruction of the home front in Germany at the end of the First World War. Everything was out in the open, and the Jews were encouraged to leave Germany and seek residence elsewhere.

The Jewish Establishment in the West, on the other hand -- and specifically in the United States -- sneaks around and pretends that their policies aren't destroying the White race. Deceit is the classic defense of a minority in its attempts to bring down the body-politic of the majority.

So what we need to do now is to continue revealing the truth about the White race's situation and the destructive environment that we live in here in the United States, and even in Europe, which is being inundated with swarms of non-White immigrants who are protected by unprincipled European governments. The more we can shine the light on what's happening, the better chance we have to change things for the better.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.