Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

The issue of government-funded insurance has taken a few interesting turns over the last few weeks. For one thing, the proponents of the plan are starting to think that they are getting close to the point where they have enough votes to get the legislation through Congress. That wasn't the case a few months ago, when it looked like the issue was going to die for lack of support, while other issues like the escalating conflict in Afghanistan were muscling into the limelight. But, although the public's anger about the continuing American failures in the Middle East hasn't abated, universal health care has gotten a shot in the arm of late, if you'll pardon the pun.

With universal government health insurance apparently looming on the horizon, opponents of the measure have taken a new tactic to rally support to their side of the issue: the question of whether the government should provide health insurance for illegal immigrants. If you haven't heard about the big feather-ruffling that has occurred for the last two weeks, you have been living in a hole. But, just so we are all on the same page, South Carolina Republican Congressman Joe Wilson shouted, "You lie!" at President Obama after the President had stated that illegal immigrants wouldn't be covered under his health plan.

The aftermath has been predictable. The liberals and Democrats and media people and the easily-offended American intellectuals just about fainted over the ghastly nature of Wilson's crime, and Wilson himself has apologized to the point where everyone - even those who were calling for his head two weeks ago - would prefer that he just shut up about it.

Of course, anyone who is anyone knows that Wilson was essentially right in his assertion that President Obama lies when he says that illegal immigrants won't have access to government insurance. Even if the letter of the law denies illegal immigrants access to that insurance, the government - that is, the taxpayers - will still foot the bill for medical treatment of illegals. The fact that the proposed legislation for universal healthcare leaves illegals out doesn't hold any water; after all, there is plenty of legislation saying that illegal immigrants aren't supposed to be in this country, and nobody in the government seems too worried about enforcing those rules.

The ironic truth is that illegal immigrants who wind up in medical facilities for treatment basically have insurance right now. By law, medical facilities are required to provide emergency care and other services to illegal immigrants. And even though the federal government gives hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to hospitals to reimburse medical costs for catering to illegal immigrants, billions every year have to be absorbed by hospitals or simply written off on taxes. In other words, by providing medical care to illegals RIGHT NOW - when there is as yet no such thing as government-funded, universal health care - our taxes are used to pay for those expenses AND, in addition, whatever isn't covered by our taxes results in higher medical costs for the rest of us, who ARE here legally and who CAN pay or who DO have private insurance.

So Representative Wilson's emphatic "You lie!" last week wasn't really even about the current government insurance proposal. It was about the medical policy on illegal immigrants as it stands right now, with the entirely logical assumption that the existing problem will snowball a million-fold if the Congress enacts legislation guaranteeing universal healthcare for all Americans. Those who are here who are NOT citizens and who pay NO income or property taxes would certainly benefit from the government's generosity in doling out tax money wrung out of hardworking Americans.

There are two underlying issues coming to a head here. One is that of fairness. In the midst of every media voice and most of the political world demanding that the United States government and its people give to illegal immigrants everything they demand - including citizenship, medical insurance, welfare benefits, free education, high-paying jobs, and so on - there is the issue as to whether all of that whining and demanding makes sense in terms of what is fair to the rest of us.

Let's consider one question related to fairness: Does a nation have the right to choose to exclude some people from the ranks of citizenship? If the answer is "yes," then the open-borders people in the media and elsewhere have no leg to stand on, and all of their open-borders nonsense goes right down the drain. Historically, civilizations have consistently answered "yes" to that question, as we can clearly see from still-existing structures like Hadrian's Wall in northern England and the Great Wall of China, as well as by the many historical documents by which this or that Gentile king gave the boot to the butt of every Jew in his kingdom.

On the other hand, if the answer is "no" - that is, a nation should have no right to exclude anyone from its ranks, as the Jewish media continue to push for - then where do we draw the line? Should every single person on the planet have the right to immigrate to North America and become an American citizen? Obviously, with nearly seven billion human beings on the planet, that situation isn't possible, so there HAVE to be criteria to keep some people out. Hard decisions have to be made with regard to what must be done and how, and since our recent ancestors couldn't find it within themselves to make those decisions and see them put into practice, that unpleasant job falls to this generation of Whites. Our actions over the next decade will show whether or not we have the courage to stand up for the survival of the White race.

Now, White racialists generally - and the National Alliance in particular - advocate that the criterion of race should be the one that governs which immigrants get into the United States and which ones don't. This criterion, we believe, is the one that is most consistent with the known facts of biology and with what is presently understood about culture, civilizations, and history. The Jews and their allies, on the other hand, have absolutely NO criterion by which immigrants should be differentiated, other than the overwhelming message we get from the Jewish media is that it is somehow WRONG and UNFAIR to try to prevent more non-Whites from entering the country. And, of course, the federal government's refusal to enforce the security of our borders only reinforces the perception in many people's minds that the government cares more about the welfare of penniless mestizos who don't speak English than it does about those of us who are already here and working our tails off just to make ends meet. We are told by those with access to the microphones that we aren't being FAIR if we try to exclude non-White immigrants, when the truth is that a non-White flood will result in our extinction, an event which I and many others think is quite unfair.

So fairness is one issue here, and the other is one of political will. Political will is the determination to accomplish what you say you are going to do. It is the desire and ability to "walk the talk." I remember a few years ago, former President George W. Bush stated that he wanted NASA to put a man on Mars. I remember laughing out loud when I first heard that on CNN and saying to myself: "What an idiot! As if, aside from the expense, America any longer had the will to complete such an undertaking!" Unlike most honest and intelligent observers, George W. Bush apparently had no understanding that it isn't merely money that makes things happen, it is also will and a feeling of a common purpose. Those things weren't universal back in the 1960s and 1970s, when the Apollo missions were taking men back and forth to and from the Moon, but they were prevalent in a much larger fraction of the American population, which was still around 90% White at the time. That population is less than 70% White now, and there is no unity of purpose, and thus there is a corresponding lack of political will.

Consider again the illegal immigrant situation. The laws against illegal immigration are on the books, but the government doesn't have the political will to enforce them, and the American population doesn't have the political will to demand enforcement from its government, which is hamstrung by the Jewish media.

Of course, the lack of political will today is evident in more places than with illegal immigration. Consider the welfare state, which is a problem so convoluted and pervasive that it is virtually impossible to analyze and summarize fully, certainly not in as small a space as this broadcast allows. So I will paint with a broad brush and, as a result, oversimplify somewhat. Nonetheless, for any nation to allow tens of millions of able-bodied citizens to sit idle, with nothing to do but receive government-subsidized housing, spend food coupons on soda and junk food, and breed into being more members of the welfare army. is to condemn such a nation to death. The government lacks the political will to enforce any type of accountability within the welfare system, just as it lacks the will to address the non-White immigration issue.

And so the fear of the most outspoken critics of President Obama's universal health plan is that the legislation will open the floodgates of tax dollars and that - yet again - the abuses of the legislation will simply be overlooked. because the government lacks the will to take a strong line and do so. It is so much easier to knuckle under and give in to abuses of universal health coverage or illegal immigration or the welfare system because to take a strong stance is to bring upon the politicians' heads the condemnation of the Jewish media.

And from the viewpoint of a corrupt politician, who would want to fight that battle? Every other politician knuckles under to the media, and any of them who didn't would be hounded out of office, as was Illinois Representative Paul Findley in 1983, after his public criticism of America's brown-nosing of Israel.

So the proposed government-funded medical insurance is viewed by opponents as legislation that will further burden the working people of America, beyond the burdens imposed by such things as illegal immigration and the welfare state, which the current System and its worldview and its political prostitutes don't have the will to straighten out.

What we want in the National Alliance is a new nation: a White nation that is guided by the ideals of progressive racialism. This nation would be led by true leaders who make decisions that are likely to ensure the survival and progress of the White race and who have the will and stamina and toughness to see to it that those decisions become actual realities in the life and work of our new White society.

Whether this nation would have a universal healthcare system or a welfare system, I can't say; there are a multitude of other things that need to be taken care of before such questions can be answered. Certainly, there is a precedent of a liberal social policy within a racialist state in the example of National Socialist Germany from the last century: liberal in the sense that the state tried to ensure the prosperity of all elements of the German population, within the confines of what is in the best interests of the German nation, without letting the individual becoming MORE important than the society. Of course, Hitler made accountability a key feature of German social policy, a feature that - as I've mentioned - is totally lacking in American social programs today. Liberal social policies are also prominent throughout most of White Europe today, and they work - so long as the population is overwhelmingly White and the people buy into the attitude that one must work, if one can, before one can eat. Here again, that attitude is nonexistent among those who benefit most from the American government's lack of political will.

Anyway, if you agree with me and the other members of the National Alliance that a White nation guided by progressive idealism and possessing a will to action would be far superior to the floundering insanity that IS the United States today, then you owe it to yourself and your children to bend your will toward that end. Check out our organization and our program of racial renewal, and then make the commitment to contribute to our people's future.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.