Hello, and welcome back to this week’s broadcast of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

Well, it’s been a week and more of ruffled feathers in the world of grassroots politics.

On July 13th, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) passed a resolution calling for Tea Party leaders to squelch the racist elements within the organization. NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous later stated that the resolution was directed at specific portions of the Tea Party, in these words:

“We take no issue with the Tea Party movement. We believe in freedom of assembly and people raising their voices in a democracy. What we take issue with is the Tea Party’s continued tolerance for bigotry and bigoted statements. The time has come for them to accept the responsibility that comes with influence and make clear there is no place for racism & anti-Semitism, homophobia and other forms of bigotry in their movement.”

In response to the NAACP’s resolution, conservative talk radio host Mark Williams wrote a satirical blog that got everyone up in arms. Pretending that he was an African-American writing a letter to Abraham Lincoln, Williams wrote, among other things:

"We Coloreds have taken a vote and decided that we don't cotton to that whole emancipation thing. Freedom means having to work for real, think for ourselves, and take consequences along with the rewards. That is just far too much to ask of us Colored People and we demand that it stop!"

It seems that Williams’ purpose was to draw attention to the distinction between what Abraham Lincoln did over a century ago – namely, free the slaves – and what big government generally and President Barack Obama specifically are doing to the working American people today – namely, enslaving them through taxation and by taking away civil rights.

Obviously, however, a whole bunch of people didn’t read Williams’ blog that way. Instead, they zeroed in on Williams’ implication that the hypothetical Black who wrote the letter to Lincoln was either incapable of working hard and thinking for himself or didn’t want to work or think. In other words, whether he meant to or not, Williams was implying that the hypothetical Black author of the letter was either stupid or lazy.

Now, there are several things that are sure to get the media’s missile lock zeroed in on you. One of these is questioning the validity of the accepted version of the Holocaust story that is peddled in the schools and in the mainstream media. Another is the assertion that the White race has, in fact, done a few good things throughout recorded history and therefore deserves to survive. And yet another is the one Mark Williams implied in his blog: that Black people are stupid and/or lazy.

Of course, the Jewish-controlled media immediately blew up Williams’ implication about the Black author being stupid and lazy into their own assertion that Williams meant such comments to apply to all Blacks. And the National Tea Party Federation immediately responded by kicking Mark Williams – and the Tea Party Express, with which he is affiliated – out of the Federation. Federation spokesman David Webb made the ouster official when he appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Now, no one is denying that there are racists and bigots within the grassroots Tea Party movement. You can find hints of racist thought in speeches given at Tea Party gatherings. Blacks who currently serve in Congress have reported being the targets of racial epithets. Missouri Congressional representative Emmanuel Cleaver was spat on, allegedly by Tea Party supporters. The openly gay Jewish Congressman from Massachusetts, Barney Frank, was taunted for his sexual orientation. Online, you can find images of posters brought to Tea Party functions with slogans like “Obama-nomics: Monkey See, Monkey Spend” or “The American Taxpayers are the Jews for Obama’s Ovens.” That last one, of course, really ruffles the Jews’ feathers: How dare anyone compare ANYBODY to “The Six Million”?

Anyway, the biggest shock to me is the fact that anyone could be surprised that racism is present to some degree in the Tea Party. After all, racism and homophobia aren’t entirely learned attitudes. There is definitely an instinctual – one might say, a “natural” – basis for defending one’s own from outsiders, whether they be sexual deviants or racial aliens. Due to the effect of the Jewish media, however, most people have learned to keep their true feelings about these matters to themselves, even to the point of repressing them so completely that they don’t really even understand that such feelings are a part of who they are.

But of course, when people get worked up about anything – whether it be the overall economic situation, their personal financial situation, or the bad choices they perceive that are being made by their government over and over and over again – their ability to rein in their true feelings is weakened. When people get upset, their inhibitions weaken, similar to when someone has consumed too much alcohol. How many times has someone said something that the Jewish media considers “naughty” when he is either angry or partially drunk or both? A few names come to mind right away, like Mel Gibson and Marlon Brando, both of whom made comments to the effect that the Jews control Hollywood and that they use that control to serve their own ends. And no one can deny that the Tea Party movement is a reactionary movement which, by definition, exists only due to its opposition to something else; in this case, big government, overtaxation, and the stealing of individual freedoms.

But, contrary to what the Jewish media might lead you to believe, the Tea Party is not alone in having racist elements in its ranks. The NAACP, no doubt, includes many Black racists among its members. The entire spectrum of Jewish organizations is full of Jewish racists from top to bottom. Latino and Asian cultural groups and business organizations certainly contain members who are preferential to their own people. The double standard put in place by the Jewish media, however, states that – except in very special and grossly obvious cases – only Whites can be racists, not anyone else.

It shouldn’t really surprise us that the Jews should sic their media on the Tea Party. It’s not that the Tea Party is a White racialist organization, despite the facts that the Tea Party’s supporters are disproportionally Whites AND that there happen to be a few racists in those ranks. No, the reason the Jews are dragging the Tea Party through the mud by highlighting the racist actions of a few of its members is that the Jews are leery of any organization or movement that might possibly compete for a share of the influence and power that the Jews now enjoy. So, while the Tea Party is no up-and-coming National Socialist German Workers Party, it IS a threat to the Jews, if only in the sense that it is a nationwide grassroots political movement made up of dissidents who would like nothing more than to see the status quo get flushed right down the toilet.

So, as White racialists, what is our stance on the Tea Party? Should we applaud its efforts to shock the existing System into a more conservative mindset, with more fiscal responsibility, more individual accountability, and less government interference? Or should we criticize it, complaining that it is just another doomed populist movement that started off in a good direction but was eventually nullified by the better-organized forces of our race’s enemies, who use the divide-and-conquer tactic to devastating effect? Already, in the events that have unfolded in the Tea Party in the last week, we see that the fragmentation of the organization has already begun, what with Mark Williams and the Tea Party Express being expelled from the larger body of the National Tea Party Federation.

Well, I’m not going to take either stance today. I’m not going to completely applaud the Tea Party, but neither am I going to overly criticize it. However you would like to say it – “Things are what they are,” “Things must run their course” – I believe that now that the Tea Party movement is here, I see no point in trying to help it NOR hinder it overmuch. I’m content to let the Tea Party do whatever it CAN do – whatever it has it in itself to do – and we in the National Alliance will continue on our path simultaneously. When the Tea Party has dissolved back into the social and political fabric of the country, we’ll still be here, and we’ll just deal with the aftermath of yet another grassroots populist political movement whose time came and went.

We racialists can’t completely endorse the Tea Party because the Tea Party isn’t a racialist movement, by any means. Sure, there are some White racists in the Tea Party’s ranks, but there are White racists in the ranks of lots of organizations; that doesn’t mean we racialists need to endorse those organizations. We would never endorse the Baptist Church, for example, simply because there are some Whites in that organization who hold racist views.

As an aside, note here that I am distinguishing between two types of Whites who believe that race is an important variable in the affairs of mankind. Those two types of Whites are ‘racist Whites’ and ‘racialist Whites.’ I use the former term, racist White, to denote a White person who is conscious of race and believes that race matters, but who lacks a clear understanding of the historical and evolutionary importance of the concept. In my mind, racists take a very simpleminded view of things, often believing that the existing political system of mass democracy is essentially a good system that needs only a few minor changes in order to be set right. In addition, racists don’t see the need for our race to acquire a mass of land that we can make into a homogeneous White racial state; they still largely buy into the existing geopolitical distinctions between the nations of the world.

White RACIALISTS, on the other hand, understand the true magnitude of race, in a long-range, biological sense. They are still perturbed by the things we all are perturbed by – noisy Blacks hip-hopping their way through the streets, Hispanics taking over neighborhoods or even entire towns, Jews always being portrayed as helpless victims who deserve compensation in any number of ways – but they see these problems as what they are: small manifestations of the much bigger problem of our race no longer having control of its destiny. White racialists realize that nothing short of a radical change – namely, a White nation-state – will be enough to save our race from complete annihilation within a few short centuries.

So, while there are RACISTS within the ranks of the Tea Party, I would venture to guess that there are very few RACIALISTS. And the platform of the Tea Party, while it may include a few items that legitimate racialists would agree with, is by no means a coherent and integrated racialist platform. It is simply a loose collection of more-or-less conservative items that aren’t held together by anything other than the fact that conservative and populist movements have endorsed those items for a very long time.

But we racialists aren’t going to hinder the Tea Party, either. The Jews will do plenty of that, of course. They’ve started to do that already, as we’ve noted, and we certainly aren’t going to help the Jews destroy another populist movement; that is to say, another movement that is fed up with the current way of things and wants a more people-centered (rather than government-centered) approach to politics. From a racialist point of view, anything that draws people away – even if only slightly – from the current system is doing a potentially good thing. Anything that gets people to think ever-so-slightly outside of the dusty, moldy box of “Democrat vs. Republican” is going to get at least a neutral reception from us racialists.

So we’ll have to watch and see what happens with the Tea Party. Meanwhile, we’ll continue our own work. I’d be pleased if you would join me in that effort.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.