Free Speech Directory || National Alliance Main Page
The most overt sexual warfare takes the form of the promotion of racial mixing, which is inserted into virtually every form of entertainment offered to us in print or electronically. Jewish-owned MTV pumps out morally and racially defiling images and music to our young people 24 hours per day via satellite and cable, and thousands of money-hungry record stores and radio stations make sure that our youngsters can take the sweet poison with them wherever they go.
But a more covert sexual warfare is taking place simultaneously. You need to learn to recognize it when you see it. Every creature on this planet, male or female, of whatever species, is born with the necessary instincts which lead it to do what it needs to do to ensure the survival of the next generation. Any species which failed to do these necessary things would quickly pass from the Earth.
Creatures, such as man, which reproduce sexually require that males fertilize females, that the children be born, and that the children be nurtured and protected to an extent sufficient to result in an increase -- or at least not a prolonged decrease -- in the numbers of the species.
For our species, sexual attraction between male and female serves the purpose of conception. Love between the couple bonds them together for the purpose of nurturing the children, and a special kind of love for the child makes the mother and father willing to sacrifice and even die if necessary so that the child may live.
Although we may analyze and justify these behaviors on purely rational grounds, it is not upon the calculations of reason that we act in the interests of our children; it is not by the light of logic that we act so that there might be children of our kind after we as individuals die.
No, these actions of ours are based upon a different kind of light -- an inner light that tells us that the healthy White child is a sacred being to be protected at any cost, an inner voice that tells us that our mate and our offspring are to be provided with the necessities of life and protected from danger. In short, there is an instinct that tells us, and has told us since the dawn of man, to do the things that must be done so that our kind will be perpetuated through the ages.
Revealed in this light, our sexual nature can be seen for what it really is: a unity of erotic love, family formation, and the birth and nurturing of our children. This unity is absolutely essential for the continued survival of our race. Breaking up this unity is one of the highest priorities of our enemies. That is the grand strategy of those who are prosecuting the sexual war against White people.
A recent article in my local newspaper confirms that nurturing behavior is not only instinctive but that the instincts have a definite genetic basis. So far, the proof only extends to mice, but it is known that the same gene exists in humans, and there is every reason to believe that all instincts, including our own, are determined by genetic structure.
BOSTON-- "Mom" Gene Spurs Mice To Nurture Little OnesThose who would destroy us do not yet have the ability to genetically alter us, but what they can do, and what they have been doing for decades, is to take advantage of the fact that as intelligent creatures we can make conscious decisions that run contrary to our instincts. Knowing that our conscious mind can override our instincts, they seek to fill that conscious mind with every possible kind of suicidal idea, from racial mixing to interracial adoption to the slaying of our healthy children in their mother's womb.
Scientists have discovered a "good mother" gene, an inborn trigger that prompts female mice to care for their young. When this gene is missing, mice show no interest in their babies. Instead, they curl up in a corner and let the young ones die. The discovery is part of an effort by scientists to learn the genetic factors that control complex behaviors in animals.
This particular gene, called fosB, is a kind of regulatory switch that turns on other genes in response to outside cues. In this case, the gene is probably activated by the sight and smell of baby mice. Humans, too, have a fosB gene. Whether it plays any role in prompting women to nurture their babies is unknown. "Whether this would be relevant to other mammals -- including people -- remains to be considered in the future," said Dr. Michael E. Greenberg. "You can't say anything more about that."
The study was conducted by Jennifer R. Brown, a doctoral student in Greenberg's lab at Children's Hospital in Boston. It was published in the mid-July issue of the biweekly journal Cell. The scientists began by creating a "knockout" mouse, an animal that was missing the fosB gene. The goal was to learn the gene's function by seeing how the animal acted without it. The mutant mice seemed normal until they gave birth. Ordinarily, a female mouse put in a cage with her babies will crouch over them and keep them warm within a minute. "The mutant will go and investigate them but fails to retrieve them and eventually goes off in a corner and ignores them," said Greenberg. Not fed or tended in any way, the babies die in a day or two. The gene also controls nurturing in male mice (although this drive is less pronounced in males).
Now I am not one of those who says that abortions must be absolutely prohibited. For example, as a thoroughgoing racial separatist, I do not presume to tell other races how they must govern their societies. They should be allowed to have whatever policies they choose -- on the other side of a secure border from us. I do not ask a woman to bear a child which is the result of rape. I do not ask a woman to bear a child which is deformed. I do not ask a woman to bear a child if its birth would kill the mother.
But today greater numbers of White children are being killed in the womb than ever before. And when we are speaking of killing our own offspring, if we are true to the instincts that ensure our survival and make us what we are, we must recognize that we are speaking of a particularly horrifying kind of killing. There is something almost unbelievably depraved about women committing this obscene act for no other reason than convenience. Any society that encourages such behavior is revealing a death-wish that may well prove fatal. But it would be a mistake to blame only White women for the large numbers of abortions today. How many White men have directly or indirectly encouraged their mates to have abortions? How many have been able to provide the emotional and financial support that a woman with children -- and children themselves -- need, but have refused to do so? It has become too acceptable for both men and women to look after only their own interests.
Since the 1973 decree by the Supreme Court legalizing abortion, at least 17,600,000 White children have been aborted. Had they been allowed to live, many of these children would be young parents by now. In a strange but probably not entirely unintended irony, we have the brown flow from Mexico to "replace" these dead White children. Thus we lose battle after battle in the sexual war against White people.
It isn't only by encouraging convenience abortion that our enemies seek to break the fundamental unity of love, family, and children which is our natural sexual nature. They also encourage the idea that sexual intercourse is a consequence-free recreation, and that any path -- any path -- to sexual pleasure and happiness is as valid as any other. Not only is homosexuality elevated to the status of an "equal" alternative to natural behavior, not only is the special feminine nature to be thrown out the window so that women can be degraded into an impossible and spiritless "equality" with men, but the more "advanced" thinkers on the campuses you subsidize are now telling our students that their inborn sexual identity may be discarded at will and another taken up in its place.
If you find that unbelievable, consider the following excerpts from an article entitled "Gender School," by Shannon Bell, from the magazine, Ctheory. Ctheory states that it is published with the assistance of the Dean of Arts and Science, and the Department of Political Science, of Concordia University in Montreal, Canada. The article concerns a being named "Kate" Bornstein who calls itself a "transgender transsexual."
Shannon Bell, is the author of a book published by the Indiana University Press and the author of a piece published by St. Martin's Press. She teaches political science at York University and teaches the "sociology of intimacy," whatever that is, at the University of Toronto.
There it is in all its sick glory. You may find it hard to believe, but the most offensive portions of this article have been edited out.
Part 1: Gender School
"Sex is f***ing, everything else is gender," Kate told us on the first day of gender school: a four-part, sixteen-hour Cross-Gendered Performance Workshop which was part of the Buddies in Bad Times Theater summer school program. Kate is a Buddhist male-to-female transsexual performance artist and gender educator. Kate has been both male and female and now is not one or the other, but both and neither.
The Cross-Gender Workshop aimed at deconstructing gender: shedding gender, trying on a new gender; getting to zero point and then constructing a new gender... . The only constraint on selecting a character was that it be some version of the opposite gender.
I decided on the male object of my desire: I had done this before, but I had never stood in the shoes of the object of my desire: a butch chickenhawk. I had usually done boy; the crossover from woman to boy is pretty easy for a butch-femme. Besides, when women do male, our male often comes out boy due to similarity in skin, size, weight, and energy. This time I was going to do the sort of male that brings me to my knees: the sardonic, gruff, older boy lover in the tradition of Jean Genet, Allen Ginsberg, and a couple of less famous, but no less impressive boy lovers whom I have had the pleasure of sharing with boys... .
Part 2: The Opposite Sex -- Is Neither!
Maggie, a goddess-in-training, "has taken a wrong turn at the moon and ends up in late-20th-century North America." Her current goddess training exercise is to allow her body to act as a conduit for seven people who are "neither male nor female, neither here nor there, and neither dead nor alive." Maggie is to hold the gateways of higher awareness open for them as they each tell their own story of crossing gender. . . .
There is Ruby, the she-male drag queen performer: breasts, big hair, lots of make-up, and a penis. She is dying, her body ripped apart by AIDS lesions. There is Kat, who enters Maggie's body as she is waking up from sex change surgery (male to female). Kat, a compulsive support group joiner who concludes that "gender's just something else to belong to.î. . .
Part 3: Kate on Kate, An Interview
Shannon: In the Cross-Gender Performance workshop you gave some very right-on definitions of gender.
Kate: Gender is simply a way to classify people. Depending on the time and the culture, there are different criteria for the classification. In this culture, at this time, it is genital. Gender assignment happens at birth when the doctor inspects for a penis. The infant is assigned gender corresponding to the presence or absence of the penis. There are more and more people who are questioning gender, and not by dint of Gender Studies Programs. In them they mainly focus on: What is the difference? They don't study gender. There is a field that is questioning gender and that is ethnomethodology. Kessler and Mc Kenna's An Ethnomethodological Approach deserves tons of credit. Part of the dedication in the book I am writing is to them.
Shannon: Gay men taught me to be the kind of woman I am now. And more recently, I learned how to be a goddess from Annie Sprinkle: I took her ten hour Slut and Goddess Transformation Salon. I also learned just from being her friend.
You were a het (heterosexual) guy until what age?
Kate: Yo, what do you want to know for? Until I was thirty-five or thirty-six.
Shannon: You changed genders, then became a lesbian. Did your taste in women change?
Kate: No, but I was finally able to be with the women I really wanted to be with. I can't tell you how many women I approached when I was a straight man only to find out they were lesbian.
Shannon: What is your taste in women?
Kate: I like a little bit of danger. I'm into S/M and I am a switch. I appreciate someone who is into switching . . . .
Shannon: What does it mean to be a sexual outlaw?
Kate: A sexual outlaw is a person who breaks sexual, or in this case, gender rules. The prime directive of gender in this culture is, if you are a woman, thou shalt not be a man. And if you are a man, it is thou shalt not be a woman. And in sex, thou shalt be heterosexual.
. . . There is a transgender liberation happening. Leslie Kleinberg writes about it in her book Transgender Liberation. Within the transgender movement there is a hierarchy: at the top of the heap are the post-operative transsexuals who pass, next down are those who don't pass as well, and then down and down and down. But it depends on where you are standing. If you are standing in the shoes of a she-male, that is the top of the heap. At the bottom of anyone's heap is the closet case who puts on his wife's panties when she is away on a business trip.
Lest you think that I exaggerate the importance of these two extremely sick individuals, may I remind you that "Kate" Bornstein, who used to be a nice Jewish boy and now is a mutilated I don't know what, has had its book published by Routledge Press and has had its work favorably reviewed by Brenda Danet of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Ms. Danet said in part:
. . . the photographs in Kate Bornstein's part- autobiographical, part analytic book on her transformation from a formerly married, biological male to a transsexual lesbian invite readers to compare her formerly male "look" with the new- female/lesbian one. Can that dashing man in a marine officer's uniform really be the same person as the attractive woman with the long, luxuriant hair, plunging neckline and earrings in the frontispiece photograph?While any writer who dares to write on behalf of the European race is excoriated and censored, and sometimes even arrested and jailed, perverted corrupters of youth like Bornstein, Bell, and Danet are respected by universities and publishing companies!
In ancient Peru lived a tribe of Indians, not far from the famous and mysterious lines of Nazca. We know them only by their paintings, which display a high degree of skill. The current inhabitants of the area have no knowledge of the people who made the paintings. They have disappeared without a trace. What little we know about these people we glean from the paintings they created. And what paintings they are! They are filled from top to bottom and margin to margin with depictions of sexual activity. They show themselves engaging in almost every conceivable type of sexual congress -- sometimes even in groups. But what is really remarkable about these paintings is not that they show such obsession with sex, but that they do not portray one particular kind of sex. They do not portray normal sexual intercourse between a man and a woman. They do not portray the kind of sexual intercourse which leads to the conception of children. And the creators of these paintings are now extinct. Draw your own conclusions.
The perverts do not have to recruit everyone in the country to achieve similar results. Our race both in America and in its home countries in Europe is already failing to reproduce itself, and its actual numbers are falling, while alien immigrants with higher birthrates stream across our borders and fill our maternity wards. Those who recruit for homosexual sodomy are a factor in pushing us ever closer to the edge of racial suicide. Every recruit for them is how many White children never born?
I am aware of the objections that some may raise in light of the evidence that homosexuality can be genetic in origin. I agree that some defective individuals may carry a gene or genes that predispose them toward a perversion of the sexual instincts. And I further admit that it would be a good thing if such genes were not carried forward to future generations, and therefore I agree that to the extent that toleration of homosexual behavior may prevent such pitiable creatures from conceiving children, it may have a eugenic effect.
But I also believe that the factors that control sexual behavior are not absolutely bipolar. Some men are more masculine than other men, who are more masculine than others still, until you reach men who seem effeminate in many ways but who are still definitely heterosexual in their proclivities and relations with women. There are also men who seem asexual. Then there are the truly defective types who form the foundation of the homosexual group.
Sexuality, particularly male sexuality, is a very powerful drive that demands satisfaction. If a teenage male, perhaps not the most masculine and perhaps a bit afraid of women, but who in ordinary circumstances would lead a healthy sex life and contribute good children to the race, is approached at an impressionable age and convinced to try homosexual perversions, and if this constitutes his first sexual experience, he may be pushed over the edge and identify himself with the sodomites and become habituated to the practice of sodomy to satisfy his sexual needs. It is not by coincidence that the perverts have always concentrated their recruiting on teenagers, as even a cursory glance at the increasingly open homosexual literature will prove to you. Oxford and Cambridge Universities, for example, were infamous for the indoctrination and recruitment of queers and Communists, and they were often one and the same.
This recruitment is often elaborated beyond perverted intercourse to include the idea that the young man is joining a secret fraternity of the very best people who are "changing the world for the better" by destroying traditional Western values, an argument which sadly does hold some appeal for "idealistic" young men sick to death with modern society and ready for a glorious revolutionary alternative. What they get is anal sodomy, death by infectious disease, and an anti-Life philosophy that perverts almost every aspect of their thinking and makes them into enemies of the race and culture which gave them birth. It is really very, very sad.
When homosexuality was strongly disapproved of, its recruiting activities and its anti-Life culture had little or no chance to develop, and the victims of the genetic defect were often objects of pity and sympathy. They were even sometimes honorable participants in the culture of the West. The defect was kept secret as much as possible, and only in the most depraved examples of the breed like the famous exemplar of the French Revolution, the "Marquis" de Sade, was the defect elevated to the level of a virtue.
A professor acquaintance of mine opines that it is almost impossible to succeed in the world of modern "art" today unless you are a Jew or a homosexual. In the giant bi-coastal con game that the art world has become, these two categories often overlap.
We all know what they have done to our art. Splotches, dabs, and unrecognizable scrawls are far from the worst of it. Ugliness and the desecration of all that is noble and beautiful are far from the worst of it. What is to follow is probably not even the worst of it.
The level of newspaper writing reaches new lows of vulgarity every year, and when I quote from articles I will use the word "excrement" in place of other words which are now apparently permitted in general circulation publications, and which I have edited out.
The British newspaper New Statesman and Society waxed eloquent recently over an art exhibition at the South London Gallery by a pair of arty perverts who call themselves "Gilbert and George." The article is titled "Fecal Fulminations: Gilbert and George's Naked [Excrement] Pictures." It states:
Representations of human feces and the male nude are the most noteworthy features of collaborators Gilbert and George's current exhibition of paintings at the South London Gallery. The works have the capacity to astonish, but they are ultimately unsatisfying.Now there's a real criticism for you! Thank you, New Statesman, for putting these culture destroyers in their place. "Unsatisfying!"
After bewailing the fact that some other critics can't handle this sweet couple's "homoeroticism," the article continues:
Naked [Excrement] Pictures, their new work, is a collection of huge jewel-colored photographs hung from floor to ceiling at the South London Gallery. The Victorian civic building is the perfect setting. . . . This might be the chapel of a neo-Gothic church with stained-glass windows by Burne-Jones or William Morris. Except that the pictures are full of the artists' own huge, hand-colored, giant [excrement], flying [excrement], cruciform [excrement], penile [excrement], and Gilbert and George with their Y-fronts round their ankles, or exposing their anuses. . . .So there you have it. "Gilbert and George" conceal their real names and ethnicities, but their "art" says it all. Severed of all moorings in European culture, if they ever had any, and severed of all ties to the natural and healthy values that well up from the soul of European man, these perverts vend their obscene degradation of our bodies and our instincts to the accolades -- or at most the amused boredom -- of the current cultural establishment. This should, but apparently does not, cause all reasonable men and women to think very long and hard about the exact nature of that current establishment.
The catalogue quotes the bible, reminding us that we are no more than dust (or [excrement]) and came into this world naked. There is an implied humanitarianism. The artist "lays his arm around the shoulders of the other human [excrement] or saves him like someone drowning at sea. . . ." In this work, Gilbert holds George like the dead body of Christ brought down from the cross. Elsewhere in "[Excrement] World" the artists gather at the foot of the cross, like the lamentors in a classical painting. Only this time the cross is made of their own [excrement].
As Freud wrote: "Defecation affords the first occasion on which the child must decide between a narcissistic and an object loving attitude. He either parts obediently with his feces, ‘sacrifices’ them to his love, or else retains them for purposes of auto-erotic satisfaction." For Freud the anal phase is arrested, pre-genital. The [excrement] is synonymous with the penis; a means of procreation. Defecation becomes the child's most valuable "gift" to be given or withheld . . . ."
Let me make it clear that I have nothing at all against nudity in art. Art reproductions, including nudes, grace the walls of my home. The glorification of the idealized human form began in the Classical civilization founded by our race. This beautiful form of artistic expression was renewed when our race rediscovered itself in the Renaissance, and continued until 1945. It is an integral part of our culture and our nature.
But to link the beauty of the human body with its waste products -- to degrade both woman and man by portraying them as receptacles for unnatural acts -- that is a product of the mentality of an alien race, Freud's race, or the product of a European mentality perverted beyond recognition by the anti-culture that surrounds homosexuality.
And what of Freud's race, the Jews? Richard Grenier, himself of Jewish ancestry, said the following about Jewish influence on the theater in the June 1993 issue of National Review and in a later follow-up letter:
Just who are the legions of theatergoers that have made homosexual theater commercially viable? Here we come to a curious recognition. Starting after World War II, Jewish playwrights have succeeded on Broadway in large numbers, and at the same time Jews have come to dominate Broadway audiences. When I returned to America from Europe in 1977, and was required for professional reasons to see almost everything on Broadway, I was intrigued to find theater audiences that seemed overwhelmingly Jewish -- a point perhaps more noticeable to the son of a Jewish mother. So I found it not especially surprising that, in a recent week of diligent theatergoing in New York, at the more commercially successful homosexual works, I got the impression that the audiences were something like 10 per cent homosexuals and 90 per cent heterosexual Jews -- to all appearances well-to-do, liberal, husband-and-wife couples. We had some heterosexual Gentiles in the audiences, no doubt, but they appeared to be a distinct minority. During a preview of Angels in America, when one of the characters uttered an expletive in Yiddish, the house positively roared with laughter. . . .The health effects of homosexual sodomy, which I have discussed in other programs, are destructive to our race. The anti-natal effects of homosexual recruitment are destructive to our race. The demoralization, perversion, and confusion that result from homosexual culture distortion are destructive to our race. The creation of a moneyed and amoral class with great political influence but no responsibility to future generations is destructive to our race.
Many liberal Jews... have fully accepted the parallel between discrimination based on race or religion and discrimination based on 'sexual orientation.' This parallel is reflected in the AIDS plays -- indeed, it is more than reflected. To put it plainly, these plays are about Jews and Jewishness almost as much as they are about homosexuality. The plays' authors are almost all Jewish. Angels in America is by Tony Kushner, Jeffrey is by Paul Rudnick, and both music and lyrics to Falsettos are by William Finn. The Night Larry Kramer Kissed Me is by the only Gentile, David Drake, but the title's Larry Kramer is Jewish and a real person. He is the author of The Normal Heart and The Destiny of Me, two angry AIDS- homosexual plays of 1985 and 1992, respectively. (Barbara Streisand is currently planning a movie version of The Normal Heart.) In all these plays a homosexual, usually the Jewish protagonist's Gentile lover, dies of AIDS. This is the fixture of these homosexual works, novels as well as plays... .
The leading Jewish figures are homosexuals and most of the leading homosexuals are Jews. The characters talk endlessly about Jews and homosexuality, homosexuality and Jews. The playwrights themselves find a correlation. Am I not to notice this?. . ."
There is no doubt that the promotion of homosexuality is a major front in the sexual war now being waged against White people. And the sexual war against us is just a theater in the total war being waged against the White race worldwide. So it will go until you and I put a stop to it.
Free Speech Directory || National Alliance Main Page