American Dissident Voices Broadcast of July 19, 2008 No Looking Back By Erich Gliebe Welcome to another edition of American Dissident Voices, the Internet radio program of the National Alliance. I'm your host and the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe. I've been a part of the White Racialist Cause for quite a while now, and I've met some interesting people in that time. Some of them are among the people I respect the most, like the late Dr. William Pierce, who founded the National Alliance back in the 1970s. Dr. Pierce was a father-figure to me, and his combination of intelligence, far-reaching knowledge, and fighting spirit had a profound impact on not only me, but also on uncounted thousands of White people all over the world. Dr. Pierce's achievements still stand today as the unique contribution of one man to the Cause that values, above all else, the survival and progress of the White race. And there are many others whom I've met through racialist activism whose achievements, compared to Dr. Pierce's, fall far short but whom I nonetheless respect as sincere men and women who truly have the best and long-term interests of our race in their hearts and minds. And, of course, I have met a small number of VERY interesting White people through my racial activism. Some of these are people who talk constantly about the so-called "movement" and who jump from group to group so that they can always find new suckers to complain to and to share their nutty theories with. Usually, these people don't remain a part of the legitimate White Racialist Cause for very long, and most of them lack the stamina to stick with anything for very long at all. Unfortunately, these are the very people that the Jewish media can pick out of just about any crowd of racialists, and it is these people who are paraded in the mass media as representative of the adherents of the White Racialist Cause. I can tell you that the White Racialist Cause, like any other cause that recruits from the public, contains a certain percentage of true activists and a tiny number of nutcases or, as Dr. Pierce used to call them: hobbyists. That shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, since the laws of probability almost guarantee this to be the case for any large group. That's the way it has always been in large political or religious movements, and that's the way it is in the White Racialist Cause, which spans many nations and languages, embracing many different people who have in common only our genetic heritage and the love of our race. Other large political and social groups, like the Republican and Democratic Parties, are no different on this count, in the sense that there is a wide distribution of intelligence, talents, and willpower in these groups as well. The National Socialist German Workers Party had a similar distribution: age differences, class differences, religious differences and, of course, ideological and personality differences. The true genius of Adolf Hitler was in his ability to unite the disparate opinions and forces within the Party -- within all of Germany, Party member or not -- and to get them all working for the betterment of Germany. Had Britain and the other Western nations NOT ganged up on Germany and had, instead, joined forces with it to help stamp out the plague of Soviet Communism, Hitler would have easily been the most successful political leader of the 20th Century. As it was, in spite of all this, the list of Hitler's achievements in reuniting a Germany torn apart by the infamous Treaty of Versailles and pulling it out of the swamp of depression are still remarkable. I don't know about you, but sometimes I catch myself wondering, "What if?" What if Britain and America had allied themselves with Germany against the Soviet Union, as the American General George Patton realized -- too late -- should have been done? What if our ancestors hadn't allowed the Jews to infiltrate our media, our business structure, and our political establishment? What if our White ancestors hadn't been so shortsighted as to bring African slaves to the New World in order to do work that could just as easily have been done by White men? What if? What if? What if? I've met and talked with a lot of people who seem to ask "What if?" quite a bit. There have been many "What if?" people who have come and gone in the White Racialist Cause generally and the National Alliance specifically. "What if?" people are just one of the many subsets of diverse Whites that can be found within the Cause. Most of these "What if?" people are fairly intelligent, and most of them have a pretty good grasp of history, better than my grasp, in some cases. They've read a lot of books on European and American history, and not just from the Second World War, but as far back as you can get in the historical record. Most "What if?" people can speak lucidly on who did what when and where they did it, and they have a clear understanding of cause and effect; namely, why things are the way they are, such as why the White race is in such a precarious situation on a worldwide scale today. If you are looking for someone to explain the White racial situation and how it got that way to someone who doesn't have a lot of experience with racialist thinking, these "What if?" people are just the people for the job. It goes practically without saying that these well-meaning White people who are "What if?" people when they are asking questions automatically become "If only…" people when they are making statements. "If only…" such-and-such a White leader, who held the future of the race in his hands at some particular time, had done this or that. THEN our race wouldn't be in this situation. "If only…" our people hadn't gone along with the Jews' plans for us to destroy this or give up that. THEN our race wouldn't be in this situation. "If only…" we hadn't let our infatuation with who had the right conception of God override our better judgment. THEN our race wouldn't be in this situation. And on and on. "What if?" "If only…" "What if?" "If only…" These people can talk your ear off, and they are usually pretty interesting, too. Often, the problem with "What if?" or "If only…" people is that they refuse to go beyond these questions. They are so mired in the past that the future doesn't count for much, in their minds. The question, "Well, what do we do about it now?" doesn't elicit much of a response from them. Whether they admit it or not, most "What if?" or "If only.." people have, probably at an unconscious level, accepted the unproven notion that the best days of the White race are over, and that the future is simply a question of how soon our race will fall off the edge into the abyss. They don't want to ponder "How soon?" -- after all, at some level, they really DO love their race -- and so to avoid that terrible question, they persist in their infatuation with the past, and burn the time away asking, "What if?" and stating definitively, "If only…" I'm not really sure WHY "What if?" and "If only…" people have already written off the future of the White race. Yes, the facts are very clear on how far we have fallen. Yes, there is no active White racialist government anywhere. Yes, our nations that were once nearly homogeneously populated with Whites are now so racially polluted as to be unrecognizable. Nowhere is the racial fall from greatness so apparent as in the United States. I know White American racialists who, fifteen years ago, used to get teary-eyed when they heard the national anthem or "The Star-Spangled Banner" -- and who today can hear the same tunes without so much as a hint of pride or heartfelt emotion; disdain is probably a more common emotion. Decade after decade of one's country doing its best to destroy the White race has a way of doing that to a man. So there is no doubt that our people are in grave danger but, on the other hand, that doesn't necessarily mean that all is lost. In fact, it seems to me that the only thing that is holding us back today is too many Whites choosing to have a defeatist attitude about our racial plight. As Shakespeare's Hamlet stated, "There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." It is our frame of mind that makes all the difference. The racial facts are irrefutable, but we have the choice to look at those facts and believe that all is lost or we can look at them and see an opportunity for improvement. It's a great thing to be knowledgeable about history, but it's a terrible thing to be imprisoned by it. "What if?" and "If only…" people are imprisoned by history. They look back and see homogeneous White nations in firm control of their destiny, and they despair of that state of things ever happening again. They look back and see that no explicitly White racialist government has ever had the long-lasting and far-reaching impact that the worldview of the National Alliance envisions, and they say it can't be done today. They look back and see the overwhelming number of cases of racial integration -- in which different races come into contact and then mix their blood, effectively destroying the unique identity of one or both of those races -- and they choose to believe that the United States and the other White nations of the West can never be un-integrated. History teaches us many things, and so it's good to have at least a working knowledge of the subject. And history has, in fact, taught us that the White nations of the West formerly had a much better grip on their destiny than they do now. And history has taught us that no explicitly White racialist government has had the kind of success that we hope to have, following our acquisition of a White racial homeland. And history has taught us that the destruction of the races through integration has been much more common than the preservation of races through voluntary or forced separation. But history has also taught us that those White nations of the past -- the ones that had a firm grip on their own destiny -- failed to use that firm grip to ensure their survival and progress. Today, we're better off, in the sense that we won't make that mistake again. And history has also taught us that, although no explicitly White government has lasted, there is at least one that held on for a dozen years against practically an entire world that was arrayed against it. We have every reason to believe that a larger and more international White racialist political body will have even more success at some point in the future. And as for un-integrating the races… there have been plenty of efforts to remove forcibly one group of people out of the body politic of another based on the criterion of race. For example, does anyone know how many times the Jews have been expelled from one nation or another throughout recorded history? A list of such expulsions (and it's a long list) would surprise you. And perhaps the most important lesson of history is that the course of history is fundamentally unpredictable. There is always a first time for something. There are patterns that recur down through the centuries, but the patterns don't always hold; there is always room for the creation of a new and better pattern. And this leads us naturally to the idea that we can choose to be responsible for the breaking of the old pattern and the making of a new one. There can be no more looking back. What's done is done. We should learn history and use it to guide us, but we aren't locked in to having to repeat the mistakes of the past. Let's learn from those mistakes, put on a face of optimism and change, and shape our world into one in which our people can live and flourish. What we need to do now is to deal with our world and the racial situation as they are right now. HOW those things got to be that way is of academic interest only. Our main concern now is what we need to do to improve the situation, so that we give the White race the best possible chance of surviving. And to do that, we have to believe in ourselves and believe that we can build a future that holds promise. Dr. Joseph Goebbels, the Reichminister for Propaganda in National Socialist Germany, stated in his pamphlet entitled Nazi-Sozi: Questions and Answers: "Have faith in the future; only thus will you win it." Dr. Goebbels was addressing a demoralized German people, beaten down with guilt over the First World War, economically strapped, and politically disenfranchised. Are not White Americans in a similar situation today? Demoralized? Beaten down with racial guilt by the Jewish media? Trying to keep food on the table? Politically fragmented and looking for real leadership? There is no looking back, there is only looking forward. Join me. I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign. This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues: SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items: National Vanguard Books P.O. Box 330 Hillsboro, WV 24946 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20 today! http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid=599 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. This information is intended for interested parties only and is not to be indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup posting. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com (c) 2008 National Vanguard Books