American Dissident Voices for March 14, 2009
What to Expect from Obama
By Erich Gliebe

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident
Voices, the Internet radio program of North America's foremost
racialist organization, the National Alliance. I'm your host and
the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe.

It looks like even an economic amateur like me can sometimes be
right when you know a few facts and have some common sense. I
have said many times on these broadcasts over the past year that
all of the stimulus efforts by the Bush Administration and now
the Obama Administration are fraught with uncertainty as to
whether or not they will REALLY work. As the weeks roll on with
no sign that the depression is letting up, all observers are now
starting to realize that the economy isn't going to turn around
on good wishes, smooth words, or even with the government
throwing trillions of dollars at it.

The rush of euphoria that swept much of the country and the world
after the election of Barack Obama in November and, later, his
inauguration in January, has started to ebb. Everyone just
assumed that because Obama was an eloquent master of words and
because everything he touched turned to gold during the campaign,
that he would be able to effect some immediate and noticeable
change in the economy. Moreover, he is a Black, and everyone
knows that Blacks are superior to Whites in every respect -- at
least, that's what the Jewish media not-so-subtly pump into the
minds of our daughters -- so how could Obama be wrong? How could
his idea about stimulating the economy NOT work? To be sure, we
don't know that it WON'T work at all; it just hasn't worked as
well and as quickly as everybody wanted, and that gets the
American public -- who are swelling the ranks of the unemployed
and who have become accustomed to instant gratification -- all
worked up, if you'll pardon the pun.

There are several important reasons why everything Obama touched
during the campaign turned to gold. For one thing, Barack Obama
is an intelligent and well-educated Black man, and he is very
good with words. That doesn't mean -- despite what the Jewish
media might have you believe -- that the rest of the black
population of the United States or anywhere else is even close to
Obama in those regards but, as Chief Executive, he has certainly
drawn the attention away from the rest of his racial kinsmen, at
least for the moment. But besides Obama's personal qualities --
which are far more endearing than George W. Bush's, I might add
-- another reason everything he touched turned to gold was that
he had the Jewish media completely on his side.

Former President Bush, of course, had outlived his usefulness,
and the Jews were ready to discard him and his would-be successor
John McCain. In other words, McCain really couldn't have done for
them anything more than Bush had already done. Once Jews like
Paul Wolfowitz had convinced Bush to invade Afghanistan on the
heels of 9/11, the Tribe of Zion had the hapless former Chief
Executive right where they wanted him. They got him to lie,
either knowingly or unknowingly, about Saddam Hussein's alleged
role in the 9/11 plot. They got him to lie, either knowingly or
unknowingly, about Iraq allegedly trying to secure uranium
shipments from Africa. They got him to lie, either knowingly or
unknowingly, about Saddam's alleged and monstrous cache of
weapons of mass destruction.

With Bush spouting these lies with absolute conviction and by
using their media to shape the public's views, the Jews succeeded
in convincing Bush to invade Iraq. Poor George probably thought
he was going to be a big war hero in the history books,
especially when the organized Iraqi army capitulated in short
order. And it wasn't long before Saddam Hussein was captured,
hiding out like "a rat in a hole," as many of the Jewish media so
gloatingly reported. The Jews had achieved their main objective,
which was to destroy Israel's chief competitor in the Middle
East. The media worked hard to deflect any discussion on that
idea, of course, but no honest and serious observer has any doubt
about that fact now.

Unfortunately for the Jews, with the fall of Iraq and Saddam
Hussein, the focus of Islamic power in the Middle East shifted to
Iran, which might in the long run have consequences more dire for
Israel than anything Saddam Hussein would have dreamed up. But it
isn't as though the worldwide Jewish establishment is just
watching now to see what happens with Iran; they are guiding the
industrialized nations to impose economic sanctions on Iran and
doing everything they can to make people believe that the
Iranians are only a few steps away from creating atomic weapons.
In their own unique way, the Jews are working this new problem
that has surfaced now that the "problem" of Iraq has been solved,
at least in the Jews' minds.

In any case, Bush had done his part, and it was time for the
Jewish meat-grinder to move on to new meat. McCain wouldn't be
able to do anything that Bush hadn't already done, so there was
no sense in the media working overtime to try to get him elected.
Obama, on the other hand, did actually hold a few cards in his
hand that the Jews wanted, and they got him elected in a historic
landslide vote.

First of all, I have no doubt that the Jewish power structure
howled with glee that a Black would be sitting in the Oval Office
and running the affairs of state. Having studied the Jews and
their habits for several decades myself, it seems to me that --
more than any other race -- the Jews seem to enjoy humiliating
their enemies. Of course, some of that is probably natural for
most races, but the Jews seem to take a particular, magnified
pleasure in humiliating those they hate. And what better way to
humiliate the entire White race in America than to put a Black
man whose mother is white on Pennsylvania Avenue?

Secondly, no matter what Obama's views on any subject, he showed
early in the campaign that his mind could be changed so that he
more closely toed the official Jewish party line. Some of you
might remember that, when Obama was first elected as a Senator
from Illinois, he was outspoken in his vehement opposition to any
further military action in Iraq; he demanded that all U.S. troops
be brought home. When the Democratic primary against Hillary
Clinton began to heat up, though, there was a subtle but
noticeable dampening of that zeal. It was especially noticeable
to those of us who were tuned in to Obama's original conviction.

And by the end of the Presidential campaign, Obama talked no
differently than Bush about what should be done with our troops
in Iraq, except that he spoke a little more eloquently and
without a Texas drawl. The Jews learned that here was a man, like
the many others they have managed except he was Black, who could
say what they wanted him to say and do what they wanted him to
do: in particular, say and do what was good for Jews generally
and, in this case, Israel specifically.

And I can think of one more very important card that Obama was
holding that the Jews might be interested in playing if and when
the time is right. That card is Obama's avowed willingness to
negotiate with media-dubbed "rogue nations" such as Iran and
North Korea.

It might strike you as strange that the Jews wanted Obama in the
White House because of his stance on negotiating with Iran. Why
would the Jews want a President who claims to be willing to talk
things out with Iran, Israel's hated enemy? Obama didn't give in
on THAT part of his platform during the campaign, as he did with
his conviction of bringing the troops home from Iraq. What good
could Obama's "open hand" to Iran possibly bring to the Jews?

Well, let's think about that for a minute. For one thing, Bush's
hard-line stance on Iran wasn't working, at least in the sense
that Iran wasn't listening to him. In fact, the Iranians were
probably too busy making jokes at Bush's expense -- just like the
rest of us were -- to bother even the slightest. Certainly, the
Iranians had (and have) no intention of turning aside from their
goal of harnessing the power of the atomic nucleus. They say they
want that power to generate electricity; the Jews say they want
it to make nuclear weapons; no one outside Iran REALLY knows what
the Iranians want with nuclear power, but there can be no doubt
that brute, coercive force is the only thing that will get the
Iranian nuclear plans off-track.

"If it is true that Iran will only respond to force," my critics
claim, "then the Jews would definitely want a hardliner like Bush
or McCain running the show. A softie on terrorism like Obama
isn't going to help the Jews there." My response to that
statement is that it sure sounds like it makes sense, but it is
completely and totally wrong.

The reason it is wrong is that the stance of the President on an
issue -- say, terrorism -- is only one factor that plays into the
equation of the United States becoming militarily involved in
foreign wars. Another factor is the willingness of the public to
follow that leader into a foreign war.

Bush went into Afghanistan because the alleged mastermind behind
9/11, Osama Bin Laden, was hiding out in the hills there
somewhere. We destroyed most of the ultra-Islamic Taliban -- and
in the process brought Afghanistan's opium production levels up
to record highs -- but we still haven't found Bin Laden. The
American public was tricked into supporting our troops going into
Iraq, mostly because of Bush's lies that I cited above, but they
were still willing to go. Based on everything that has transpired
since with regard to Bush's lies, coupled with the ultimate
failure of our military and diplomatic efforts in the now-chaotic
Iraq, the American people would never, EVER follow a Bush
wanna-be like John McCain into battle. Had John McCain been
elected four months ago, there would have been NO HOPE of there
being any American military presence in Iran. The American public
and the Democratic Congress would not have allowed it.

But with Barack Obama, the Jews are hopeful that there still is a
possibility for American military action in Iran. Not that it
will be anytime soon. It might not be until the beginning of
Obama's second term, assuming he gets elected again in four
years. But after years of failed negotiations -- of Iran's
continual rejection of the demands of the Jew-led Americans that
Iran concede the contest and acknowledge Israel as the sole
shaper of policy in the Middle East -- the American people will
be willing to reconsider another foreign war. And the Jewish
media will find that making Americans reconsider sending their
relatives and their friends and their money to yet another
foreign land will be SO much easier if Iran "does" something to
provoke us.

Getting Iran to "do" something to the United States shouldn't
really be much of a problem for those who pull the strings of
power, at least if history is any indicator. It can be done in a
number of ways. Either something can be completely fabricated, as
in the case of Bush's multitudinous lies about Saddam Hussein, or
the Iranians can be squeezed to such an extent that war is
preferable to any further squeezing. That is just what the
crippled and power-mad Franklin Delano Roosevelt did to the
Japanese to provoke them into their attack on Pearl Harbor, which
was a desperate attempt to completely destroy the American
Pacific fleet at one fell swoop. FDR chose to sacrifice over
three thousand American lives and quite a few surface ships in
the baiting of the Japanese but, NOT coincidentally, not a single
aircraft carrier was moored at Pearl Harbor that day. The
aircraft carriers, of course, were the most influential ships in
the war in the Pacific.

Anyway, the point here is that President Obama's talk about
negotiation with Iran cannot be counted upon to last. Woodrow
Wilson was re-elected in 1916 under the slogan, "He kept us out
of war." Two-and-a-half months after his second inauguration, he
asked Congress for a declaration of war against Germany, based in
large part on the highly-suspect Zimmermann Telegram. FDR spoke
loudly of keeping the U.S. out of the war in Europe until after
he was re-elected in 1940, then he bent his mind on war with the
help of his so-called "Brain Trust," which was solidly stocked
with Jews.

Obama might end up being manipulated for a similar fate by forces
beyond his control. It is something to keep in mind as his
administration unfolds.

I'm Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid
=599
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2009 National Vanguard Books