American Dissident Voices for July 4, 2009
The Induced Generation Gap
By Erich Gliebe

Hello, and welcome back to another edition of American Dissident
Voices, the Internet radio program of North America’s foremost
racialist organization, the National Alliance. I’m your host and
the Chairman of the Alliance, Erich Gliebe

It has become a cliché for older generations to criticize the
direction of younger generations. But is it always just a cliché,
and can generational changes always be written off as harmless
reactions to the status quo which are quickly forgotten when the
young eventually take on adult responsibilities? Associated Press
writer Hope Yen examined a recent and relevant study by The Pew
Research Center about the current generation gap. In her article,
titled “Study Finds Widening Generation Gap in US,” Yen addresses
the following findings: “From cell phones and texting to religion
and manners, younger and older Americans see the world
differently, creating the largest generation gap since the
tumultuous years of the 1960s and the culture clashes over
Vietnam, civil rights, and women’s liberation.” In fact, almost 8
out of 10 people believe there are major differences between the
generations today. That is the highest spread since 1969. So
let’s compare and contrast the generations of the Sixties with
those of today in order to throw some light on the generation gap
issue.

First let’s look at politics. Young people aged 18 to 29 voted
for Democrat Barack Obama by a 2-1 margin. With the Vietnam War a
hot issue in 1968, young people supported Richard Nixon for
president over Hubert Humphrey. Humphrey, as Vice-president under
Lyndon Johnson, was not trusted by the young due to their strong
dislike for Johnson, whom they blamed for intensifying the
Vietnam War. Of course, President Nixon quickly became as
unpopular as Johnson because of his further escalation of the
Vietnam War and his refusal to pull out troops short of an
American victory. Campus riots were commonplace in those years as
young people became flower children by wearing hippie garb and
indulging in psychedelic drugs. Older folks howled that if the
young did not reform, the end was near. Nixon largely nullified
the young people’s anger when he abandoned the national draft and
implemented a lottery system. This led many, including Nixon, to
conclude that young people were cowardly and self-absorbed rather
than righteously angry and ethically motivated. A measurable
diminishing of youth anger proved Nixon at least partially right.

Today, youthful anger over the Iraq and Afghanistan wars is not
nearly as hot as that expressed over the Vietnam War in the
Sixties. Still, since World War Two, American young people have
generally opposed wars in which they have been called to fight,
and that is one reason, even without a national draft, they
overwhelmingly backed Obama over McCain. They viewed McCain as an
old soldier, a relic that wanted the Iraq War to last for 100
years. But despite their negative view of McCain, they backed
Obama for many social reasons as well.

According to the Pew foundation, people aged 18 to 29 report
disagreements over lifestyle, family issues, relationships, and
dating. On the other hand, the older generation sees the major
difference as young people’s sense of entitlement. In other
words, older people criticize young people’s expectation that
they somehow deserve what older people had to work for. This
sense of entitlement began growing in the post-World War II years
when adults who had weathered the Depression and the war gave
their children an unprecedented amount of material things. The
young are still “addicted” to material things today, much of
which they somehow feel they are owed. People of middle age view
the generation gap largely as one of manners, opining that the
young today engage regularly in obscene speech and show a marked
disrespect for their elders. This perception is largely in sync
with reality.

Since the mid- to late Sixties, young people have demanded more
freedom within the family than ever before. Well, earlier
generations of youth may have demanded more freedom, but their
parents were not so weak and indecisive as to give it to them!
Illegal drug use among the young rose in the Sixties and is even
higher today. Out of wedlock births recently rose to an all-time
high, the largest percentage being reported by mestizos and
Blacks. All of this took root in the Sixties and continues to
grow today.


Perhaps the greatest reason young people voted for Obama was the
sense that he shared their social and ethical values. For
example, he promised change (particularly progressive economic
change), and young people have always loved change. Second,
although he said he believed marriage to be between a man and a
woman, few really believed that he would veto a bill legalizing
gay marriage. John McCain, on the other hand, said he would veto
such a bill and probably would have. The Sixties Generation was
motivated strongly by a desire for racial and sexual equality.
Today, the older generation, such as those in Congress and on the
courts, still sees inequality as a major problem. On the other
hand, young people (especially young White people) are not nearly
as active in civil rights organizations and feminist groups as
their counterparts in the Sixties. They seem to understand that
no real social or economic barriers are today blocking the
success of non-Whites and women. The civil rights legislation of
the Sixties took care of that. Still, non-White minorities claim
they are entitled to more than equal rights; they are also
entitled to equal outcomes. This is probably one reason the older
generation criticize the young’s sense of entitlement.

Another major difference between the young and the old involves
religion. Two-thirds of adults 65 and over said that religion is
very important to them compared with just over half of those 30
to 49 and forty-four percent of those 18 to 29.

Most of the generation gap phenomenon can be traced to the
schools and the entertainment media. People who passed through
the public schools in the Sixties and beyond went on to “higher
education” and eventually became “tenured radicals.” They in turn
taught progressive, relativistic values to successive generations
of citizens and teachers. These people then went on to reinforce
progressive ideas in their children and students. Tolerance was
first enforced, followed later by the requirement that we
celebrate differences. Today, the only people falling outside the
umbrella of tolerance are White people, particularly White
heterosexual males. Our colleges and universities have for
decades done much to undermine White males.

The news and entertainment media did the rest. Headed by Jews who
promote a weakening of America’s cultural values, the news media
joined the schools in pointing out all of America’s perceived
flaws, many of which were attributed to the practice of
traditional American values redefined by progressives as White
supremacy, intolerance, misogyny, and homophobia. At the same
time, television and movies showed the races as working and
living together in cheerful harmony, and showing that homosexuals
are just like everybody else -- all just good progressive
Americans. And you need not look any further to discover what
caused the young's increased use of obscene language and lack of
manners sited earlier. The cause was and is the controlled media.

So, there is indeed a generation gap today. If this proves
nothing else, it proves that Dr. Pierce was right in arguing that
political conservatism is doomed to failure in a democracy. As he
pointed out, when progressives take power they move things
slightly in their direction. When conservatives retake power they
have to hold the line established by progressives so that things
don’t change to their detriment. Then, when progressives retake
power, they move things slightly more in their direction. In
other words, progressives, by their nature, are change agents on
the offensive, and conservatives, by their nature, are defenders
of cultural beliefs and values that are constantly being eroded
by the opposition, by people who see the world in a different
way. Nobody ever won a war by constantly playing defense, and
conservatives are doomed to lose the culture war if it continues
to be fought within a democratic system.

In the case of President Obama, so revered by the media, the
educational establishment, and the young, we have the apex of
progressive change. The seeds of America's cultural destruction
were planted by Jews when they began buying into and eventually
monopolizing the opinion-forming media at the beginning of the
20th Century. The seeds were watered by both Republicans and
Democrats who voted in affirmative action with the Sixties' civil
rights laws, thereby guaranteeing discrimination against Whites.
The seeds were carefully tended by the counter-culture of the
Sixties, which also planted more seeds.

Now we come to the Mulatto Messiah, the most radical of all
progressive presidents. Under Obama, progressives have laid the
last covering of manure in preparation for the great harvest
expected in 2012 or shortly after. Obama and his handlers began
their assault on America by refinancing certain overseas abortion
services. He then took over American auto companies and banks
while sending America into greater debt than ever before dreamed
of. A bogus "energy" bill is now headed for the Senate, which, if
passed, will punish American industries that rely on the use of
energy for their profits. And which industries don't rely on
energy!

Thus, in due time, Obama and his handlers will control American
industry in general by placing intolerable restraints on it. This
bill will also increase unemployment in America. After the energy
bill, Obama says he and his Democrat Congress will tackle the
nation's health care problem by insuring all citizens. How? With
tax payers' dollars! He says his government plan will be
optional. Yes, it probably will be, except that enough Americans
will join it to destroy independent insurance companies. Then,
unless you are quite wealthy, your only option will be the
government plan. Oh, by the way, the President and Congress will
be exempt from the government plan. But you probably could have
guessed that. When the dust finally clears, Obama will control
health care. He and his bureaucrats will determine which doctors
you can see and when, if ever, you can see them. We will have a
health care system like Canada's and England's, both of which are
disasters. Obama will have succeeded in creating an America that
will not be a worker's paradise.

Finally, Obama says he will sign into law some kind of
immigration reform bill. It will be an amnesty bill. At the time
that Americans are crying for jobs, Obama will give citizenship
to the illegals already here, promise to close the southern
border, and then do nothing. The last thing to destroy will then
be the White race, the destruction of which is already well under
way.

Now, all of this apparently represents the world of the future
envisioned by our young people. So, does the generation gap
matter? Yes, it emphatically does! Our young generations have
been transformed right under our noses by forces we have
acknowledged but failed to fight. The values and beliefs that
made America great are dying and the America envisioned by the
old is dying with them. When the parents of a new generation fail
to teach their children the value of the culture in which they
live, the young will seek elsewhere for values. There are always
those out there willing to fill that vacuum for their own
purposes. Older generations of Americans have allowed this sorry
decline to happen, and now the harvest nears. It won't be pretty.

Therefore, it is our duty -- to our children and our children’s
children -- to fight for a brighter world. And a good place to
start is with the program of the National Alliance.

I’m Erich Gliebe, and thanks for being with me again today.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
SUBSCRIBE to NATIONAL VANGUARD, our unique, thought-provoking 
magazine -- $22 US, $30 Canada, and $40 Foreign.
This is for six high-quality, glossy color issues:

SEND $3 for our 88-page CATALOG of books and other items:

     National Vanguard Books
     P.O. Box 330
     Hillsboro, WV  24946
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Donations are needed to keep this program on the air. Give $20
today!
http://www.natvanbooks.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_prod.html?p_prodid
=599
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> The National Alliance has a strict anti-spamming policy. 
This 
information is intended for interested parties only and is not to
be 
indiscriminately distributed via mass e-mailing or newsgroup
posting.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The National Alliance: www.natvan.com & www.natall.com
National Vanguard Books: www.natvanbooks.com

(c) 2009 National Vanguard Books